Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030185AbWILKfr (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Sep 2006 06:35:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030189AbWILKfr (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Sep 2006 06:35:47 -0400 Received: from mailhub.sw.ru ([195.214.233.200]:9740 "EHLO relay.sw.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030185AbWILKfq (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Sep 2006 06:35:46 -0400 Message-ID: <45068D81.5000606@openvz.org> Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 14:35:45 +0400 From: Pavel Emelianov User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060317) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vatsa@in.ibm.com, balbir@in.ibm.com, sekharan@us.ibm.com CC: Rik van Riel , CKRM-Tech , Dave Hansen , Andi Kleen , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Christoph Hellwig , Andrey Savochkin , devel@openvz.org, Matt Helsley , Hugh Dickins , Alexey Dobriyan , Kirill Korotaev , Oleg Nesterov , Alan Cox Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory) References: <44FDAB81.5050608@in.ibm.com> <44FEC7E4.7030708@sw.ru> <44FF1EE4.3060005@in.ibm.com> <1157580371.31893.36.camel@linuxchandra> <45011CAC.2040502@openvz.org> <1157730221.26324.52.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4501B5F0.9050802@in.ibm.com> <450508BB.7020609@openvz.org> <4505161E.1040401@in.ibm.com> <45051AC7.2000607@openvz.org> <20060911102152.GC17182@in.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20060911102152.GC17182@in.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1033 Lines: 24 Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote: > On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 12:13:59PM +0400, Pavel Emelianov wrote: > >> If I set up 9 groups to have 100Mb limit then I have 100Mb assured (on >> 1Gb node) >> for the 10th one exactly. And I do not have to set up any guarantee as >> it won't affect >> anything. So what a guarantee parameter is needed for? >> > > I presume you are talking of hard-limiting each group to 100 MB here. In > which case, wont the 100MB (reserved for 10th group) be unutilized > untill 10th group is started (it may never be started for that matter!). > > IMO it would be better to go and use that free 100 MB for reclaimable memory > and give that up when 10th group is started. > Sure. I've talked about the unreclaimable memory. Sorry, for not specifying it explicitly. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/