Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 13 Jan 2021 19:22:11 -0800
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
To:     Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Cc:     bpf@vger.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@chromium.org>,
        Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        =?utf-8?B?QmrDtnJuIFTDtnBlbA==?= <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
        Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v6 00/11] Atomics for eBPF
Message-ID: <20210114032211.ynhesnthmsrfotfv@ast-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
References: <20210112154235.2192781-1-jackmanb@google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20210112154235.2192781-1-jackmanb@google.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 03:42:24PM +0000, Brendan Jackman wrote:
> Happy new year everyone, and thanks once again for the reviews.
> 
> There's still one unresolved review comment from John[3] but I don't
> think it needs to block the patchset as it stands, it can be a
> separate patch. Hope that's OK.
> 
> Differences from v5->v6 [1]:
> 
> * Carried Bj?rn T?pel's ack for RISC-V code, plus a couple more acks from
>   Yonhgong.
> 
> * Doc fixups.
> 
> * Trivial cleanups.

Please fix riscv build and resubmit.
I think that's the only outstanding issue left.