Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:2785:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id ia5csp258448pxb; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 05:22:27 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyudsxWkCLDe+Mm9a9fY/5GblJH+vrYOj/qRbtCr/ghhiWRwhgC/pN9EHmbfXP5oF6L1XxM X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:3711:: with SMTP id d17mr5131170ejc.121.1610630547643; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 05:22:27 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1610630547; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=fC/DWKO4fE/jAlCulApl2dkWQElK27z2U2SE8AzQ9B3vdsAjEVKd6QaGkK90gyZdXG fSpxZHbvp2bNc+I6QyYrJY+sjSBmim9Bd9+U6CFePFu0EaT5gkvPZp5OE9MNzOwYuMH+ rf6XmoRSZNYO9fpnNm1snwsg1DfzktiEgUkhn8BpkZMx9tbo7Cq5S9Uk9QDTwTBfS/Lk sUyV6tFuZy2/7zXOCoe3HP6RkE2WxaWCfeCUAawDwk9i5xvr1cyP3PDnM51vwWSK2cBM lWLQ4yi3VWCsW2wleBLTg+QyODMvMRQ1QoNl3yFE0JpaBmPn2m3GBq055QcPVz2MOWr+ 6UrQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=K21q5GEVd9IZHgFsopjsF/6ZI6W3+T/M2kVExhooyC8=; b=CePhbqPlpYEhPbHlV/+mCqvFWu3XwKTX/pvTf7Hmb54qlxPkk/0wCB77rONEcqefRQ 3Lcqp3Oed/LBM2340nky3yiwrBD7LzaV1Z0ec4k+ycNFkBacGov6sOuNQfMwET38zhKb H0CheTDyHqY8KnGM1g97KsAgVpQXN/aCDSDk4bSNCRnFQLDZ1zejx6J7ulrtSP85HLxH wjsqmZudRS9FCA5i9qqA7m6AX+pmdatvtMDKKRdsA1eN+4bfnRSGduT5puY3FmeczasY SR9Iq9MNqTrWpb5NUmz3v4IH0Ggj5ELwoIu5hOqBUifOd5tAjOe6Oad/FGkyKi6XWqjk NrTw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ibm.com header.s=pp1 header.b=F8bxLBdH; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y19si2590010eje.423.2021.01.14.05.22.03; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 05:22:27 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ibm.com header.s=pp1 header.b=F8bxLBdH; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728142AbhANNVA (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 14 Jan 2021 08:21:00 -0500 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:32658 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726579AbhANNVA (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jan 2021 08:21:00 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098404.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 10EDFXcL014631; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 08:20:17 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=subject : to : cc : references : from : message-id : date : mime-version : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=K21q5GEVd9IZHgFsopjsF/6ZI6W3+T/M2kVExhooyC8=; b=F8bxLBdHTHzrOS8sqtwROVEfyZb8DsZM3QhBd/1qhud+4WEforckc66Rw3lkuGvmEFGA upjPnqgfuxqcPDaocOUCuJ21ekE0A2ar67i2940GoNAnVAUZLv9eskajCYMKKwGsi32s G9sz1+2ff7hWiyVDVtNObC9IWmI9qZYqvRVpXK/iLvVtxOhQLyfv5WUSZzPzHQmQW29G 3XttsFXq64fWLamhbxZn0XiGBeaJsqJSA4J54aRuoyICmDBbh/MsCreNTzNpmNWJxJPA DYDFFAstqFkyO5ed+Vha2DWLu0/TIUZMbylVeaU1Tg2n/PAERrkavqr3yXPHYJ9TG9IE oQ== Received: from ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com (62.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.98]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 362p90923h-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 14 Jan 2021 08:20:16 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 10EDHDPf002945; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 13:20:14 GMT Received: from b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay10.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.195]) by ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 35y447xegu-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 14 Jan 2021 13:20:14 +0000 Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.58]) by b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 10EDKBfY31719866 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 14 Jan 2021 13:20:11 GMT Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D5234C05C; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 13:20:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0BC44C05E; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 13:20:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.145.25.124] (unknown [9.145.25.124]) by d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 13:20:10 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [RFC 1/1] s390/pci: expose UID checking state in sysfs To: Bjorn Helgaas , Christian Brauner Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Pierre Morel , Peter Oberparleiter , Viktor Mihajlovski References: <20210113185500.GA1918216@bjorn-Precision-5520> From: Niklas Schnelle Message-ID: <675aa466-59ea-cf8a-6eec-caa6478ba4cd@linux.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 14:20:10 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210113185500.GA1918216@bjorn-Precision-5520> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.343,18.0.737 definitions=2021-01-14_04:2021-01-14,2021-01-14 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 mlxlogscore=955 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 priorityscore=1501 suspectscore=0 clxscore=1011 impostorscore=0 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 adultscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2101140075 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 1/13/21 7:55 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 08:47:58AM +0100, Niklas Schnelle wrote: >> On 1/12/21 10:50 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 10:38:57AM +0100, Niklas Schnelle wrote: >>>> We use the UID of a zPCI adapter, or the UID of the function zero if >>>> there are multiple functions in an adapter, as PCI domain if and only if >>>> UID Checking is turned on. >>>> Otherwise we automatically generate domains as devices appear. >>>> >>>> The state of UID Checking is thus essential to know if the PCI domain >>>> will be stable, yet currently there is no way to access this information >>>> from userspace. >>>> So let's solve this by showing the state of UID checking as a sysfs >>>> attribute in /sys/bus/pci/uid_checking > >>>> +/* Global zPCI attributes */ >>>> +static ssize_t uid_checking_show(struct kobject *kobj, >>>> + struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf) >>>> +{ >>>> + return sprintf(buf, "%i\n", zpci_unique_uid); >>>> +} >>>> + >>>> +static struct kobj_attribute sys_zpci_uid_checking_attr = >>>> + __ATTR(uid_checking, 0444, uid_checking_show, NULL); >>> >>> Use DEVICE_ATTR_RO instead of __ATTR. >> >> It's my understanding that DEVICE_ATTR_* is only for >> per device attributes. This one is global for the entire >> Z PCI. I just tried with BUS_ATTR_RO instead >> and that works but only if I put the attribute at >> /sys/bus/pci/uid_checking instead of with a zpci >> subfolder. This path would work for us too, we >> currently don't have any other global attributes >> that we are planning to expose but those could of >> course come up in the future. > > Ah, I missed the fact that this is a kobj_attribute, not a > device_attribute. Maybe KERNEL_ATTR_RO()? Very few uses so far, but > seems like it might fit? > > Bjorn > KERNEL_ATTR_* is currently not exported in any header. After adding it to include/linuc/sysfs.h it indeed works perfectly. Adding Christian Brauner as suggested by get_maintainers for their opinion. I'm of course willing to provide a patch for that move should it be desired. @Bjorn apart from the correct macro do you have a preference for either suggested path /sys/bus/pci/zpci/uid_checking vs /sys/bus/pci/uid_checking? For completeness some further internal discussion lets us tend to rather name it to "unique_uids" but I guess that doesn't make a difference to non s390 people ;-)