Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:2785:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id ia5csp370886pxb; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 07:55:38 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx64KQVq25cKmgtPN1y2BOHniDQuOk7oZI4jEstac+JUg+b5zqsd4xEhvEtHCOhmC4ZDvO0 X-Received: by 2002:a50:d484:: with SMTP id s4mr6205305edi.13.1610639738711; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 07:55:38 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1610639738; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=BGIOPWhi57e6fd5HuzsCrDiW24oowvEIkg6OjJ2R6tdqOnhJPEbMLO0O+rRA8ylW1i 6i2ZDxDj1tQN9ypJ3+8+xMBTwEj+qKyGbLAc/NDlC6aI04HrddOyucf9PFx7I0ggBhYi kH/gunVU+rcWon3y2F5V2eT9l/fWwCtKV3FGNGdidTU2aCIGOV9BG3QULjUnqyrpIbFR OSAf12F7uCiUJWhvLA9LR8jWsBDDAjp8pwFZP8W5LUTUsUVIMzvwa0pkENkFlUYnS08o vsLUgJydAchBXQR3XHZ1HS+c5qAUcReUxVula+wxMP/A8XtJ1AV1dK4u5yEpIifDpLJ3 uMeA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :organization:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from :date; bh=pL7LbKUAlR1j1cPmMgvf0kHAHb0bRHcP2m9ZbmEwOKw=; b=QexiMUuGL5df6voHog5VCau6o+yX+2ZjM7TpeHq35eNBmktPqFRu3lqlN0DTTzZwzW aJ+na+oGjUyz3RJ9RCAecT2JHFZ+hDvBdCvzLL1EeBrt7Cu8qtKd/SgNv6We3mmU3MV5 /sIS7FiiGCqatGXmK4lfEYN21gEXTYUuuRp6VcoINClWJGGwntpT3qwC6X5gyMN2ZG2s NZmrOADJOOHhZr3jWSsjX+co6A16+NpsAKd66tsHN+PlDjL3ttsN5UHYWClbT0475yoM wCf0fzvu2hn26QoK7NWD4qNwPizX4j7nq27vpYNuAcJCUGb4dxwimUmK2cxEZHZwsfk8 ERpw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id gw24si2591206ejb.715.2021.01.14.07.55.14; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 07:55:38 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729220AbhANPyK convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 14 Jan 2021 10:54:10 -0500 Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.195]:46091 "EHLO relay3-d.mail.gandi.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725957AbhANPyJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jan 2021 10:54:09 -0500 X-Originating-IP: 86.201.233.230 Received: from xps13 (lfbn-tou-1-151-230.w86-201.abo.wanadoo.fr [86.201.233.230]) (Authenticated sender: miquel.raynal@bootlin.com) by relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4CA576000D; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 15:53:26 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 16:53:25 +0100 From: Miquel Raynal To: Md Sadre Alam Cc: manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org, richard@nod.at, vigneshr@ti.com, boris.brezillon@collabora.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sricharan@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] mtd: rawnand: qcom: update last code word register Message-ID: <20210114165325.3d510355@xps13> In-Reply-To: <1610251305-20792-1-git-send-email-mdalam@codeaurora.org> References: <1610251305-20792-1-git-send-email-mdalam@codeaurora.org> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.4 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, Md Sadre Alam wrote on Sun, 10 Jan 2021 09:31:45 +0530: > From QPIC version 2.0 onwards new register got added to a > read last codeword. This change will update the same. the? ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Please reword this sentence. > For first three code word READ_LOCATION_n register will be > use.For last code word READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_n register will be > use. "For the first three codewords, READ_LOCATION_n registers will be used. The last codeword register will be accessed through READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_n." Also, please specify what these registers store. > Signed-off-by: Md Sadre Alam Could someone please test this patch? > --- > [V3] > * Added else condition for last code word in update_rw_regs(). > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- > 1 file changed, 70 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c > index 667e4bf..50ff6e3 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c > @@ -48,6 +48,10 @@ > #define NAND_READ_LOCATION_1 0xf24 > #define NAND_READ_LOCATION_2 0xf28 > #define NAND_READ_LOCATION_3 0xf2c > +#define NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_0 0xf40 > +#define NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_1 0xf44 > +#define NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_2 0xf48 > +#define NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_3 0xf4c > > /* dummy register offsets, used by write_reg_dma */ > #define NAND_DEV_CMD1_RESTORE 0xdead > @@ -187,6 +191,12 @@ nandc_set_reg(nandc, NAND_READ_LOCATION_##reg, \ > ((size) << READ_LOCATION_SIZE) | \ > ((is_last) << READ_LOCATION_LAST)) > > +#define nandc_set_read_loc_last(nandc, reg, offset, size, is_last) \ > +nandc_set_reg(nandc, NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_##reg, \ > + ((offset) << READ_LOCATION_OFFSET) | \ > + ((size) << READ_LOCATION_SIZE) | \ > + ((is_last) << READ_LOCATION_LAST)) > + > /* > * Returns the actual register address for all NAND_DEV_ registers > * (i.e. NAND_DEV_CMD0, NAND_DEV_CMD1, NAND_DEV_CMD2 and NAND_DEV_CMD_VLD) > @@ -316,6 +326,10 @@ struct nandc_regs { > __le32 read_location1; > __le32 read_location2; > __le32 read_location3; > + __le32 read_location_last0; > + __le32 read_location_last1; > + __le32 read_location_last2; > + __le32 read_location_last3; > > __le32 erased_cw_detect_cfg_clr; > __le32 erased_cw_detect_cfg_set; > @@ -644,6 +658,14 @@ static __le32 *offset_to_nandc_reg(struct nandc_regs *regs, int offset) > return ®s->read_location2; > case NAND_READ_LOCATION_3: > return ®s->read_location3; > + case NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_0: > + return ®s->read_location_last0; > + case NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_1: > + return ®s->read_location_last1; > + case NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_2: > + return ®s->read_location_last2; > + case NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_3: > + return ®s->read_location_last3; > default: > return NULL; > } > @@ -719,9 +741,14 @@ static void update_rw_regs(struct qcom_nand_host *host, int num_cw, bool read) > nandc_set_reg(nandc, NAND_READ_STATUS, host->clrreadstatus); > nandc_set_reg(nandc, NAND_EXEC_CMD, 1); > > - if (read) > - nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 0, 0, host->use_ecc ? > - host->cw_data : host->cw_size, 1); > + if (read) { > + if (nandc->props->qpic_v2) > + nandc_set_read_loc_last(nandc, 0, 0, host->use_ecc ? > + host->cw_data : host->cw_size, 1); > + else > + nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 0, 0, host->use_ecc ? > + host->cw_data : host->cw_size, 1); > + } > } > > /* > @@ -1096,9 +1123,13 @@ static void config_nand_page_read(struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc) > static void > config_nand_cw_read(struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc, bool use_ecc) > { > - if (nandc->props->is_bam) > + if (nandc->props->is_bam) { > + if (nandc->props->qpic_v2) > + write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_0, > + 1, NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL); > write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_READ_LOCATION_0, 4, > NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL); > + } > > write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_FLASH_CMD, 1, NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL); > write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_EXEC_CMD, 1, NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL); > @@ -1633,16 +1664,28 @@ qcom_nandc_read_cw_raw(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip, > } > > if (nandc->props->is_bam) { > - nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 0, read_loc, data_size1, 0); > + if (nandc->props->qpic_v2 && cw == (ecc->steps - 1)) > + nandc_set_read_loc_last(nandc, 0, read_loc, data_size1, 0); > + else > + nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 0, read_loc, data_size1, 0); You repeat many times this logic, a helper to avoid this extra indentation level with the if/else block is needed. > read_loc += data_size1; > > - nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 1, read_loc, oob_size1, 0); > + if (nandc->props->qpic_v2 && cw == (ecc->steps - 1)) > + nandc_set_read_loc_last(nandc, 1, read_loc, oob_size1, 0); > + else > + nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 1, read_loc, oob_size1, 0); > read_loc += oob_size1; > > - nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 2, read_loc, data_size2, 0); > + if (nandc->props->qpic_v2 && cw == (ecc->steps - 1)) > + nandc_set_read_loc_last(nandc, 2, read_loc, data_size2, 0); > + else > + nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 2, read_loc, data_size2, 0); > read_loc += data_size2; > > - nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 3, read_loc, oob_size2, 1); > + if (nandc->props->qpic_v2 && cw == (ecc->steps - 1)) > + nandc_set_read_loc_last(nandc, 3, read_loc, oob_size2, 0); > + else > + nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 3, read_loc, oob_size2, 1); > } Thanks, Miquèl