Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:2785:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id ia5csp428744pxb; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 09:12:51 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyZlVtvSCe40O7HQsLXoFBYvCWvOPeOZX0ssYUHZuaUKt4LLigLvTKgX5emxUW6aKY6Tt4B X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:adcb:: with SMTP id lb11mr5816398ejb.346.1610644371034; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 09:12:51 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1610644371; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=a9JcT6pyhqnI1HtDNIlGwHEvPNv2MJKsG2W0KOGpDKWVpTHhzsEo3ws2h8Wj/xo9U0 2z8WSYj3S+PnCkIFVM1ZiZ1R4MsDzng2jxx9iG4Lwr4dy2HVDt4fGIY+P+k6MmL79+P5 5aM8Y4l4EqGOElJRuLPfsG3TpT+iPAS50u1lf68JU8EcIK3mI0Hk5RSQn1ssksIFqwC1 9VHOq3zACmRuaFdKjVNVcThyADni4Hc+KRBsoxf4c5xE+qT6rq92EHSWJVNOklljfjLO X2oNP/RYB7ma9MlAYWkbOB+YlIH/ZEJyhBP1RXZOVktNMhlFna66sT0UKgcGJ8NSXGMI qgyg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=rulcIsdiEGHNoW8ESlRghH9XVhQcLihfLdJxeao6dAE=; b=kt4sLWhysUaTCURBPHi+7nMJFOozhuJQk6Qa59yIEll9pK5ZKcU6ruyCkLeDFSd12S bTrGX2t3BAxs6O8PYqf/3G/AhwNW9GW2giWG3O+GHBsmswbmEssDv4ZcvmGDfSsAW7/o S8JW6Rk+Fxjp2G5IaC2wohWJGmYmNlzColUd8785CO50BEZ1xTZjdN39KMGGNB56378t GTxZ3Whc48Jc4EtSS17Kueq6dNaVWbjewrlWxgXuf93p/hgskIqqagF5Qu0UbXe1Edid QquUF1KZIMVWjukJKClre667jG4kErjQM9tl1OwoCAcDS8YkboHvhEun0Fo9tzLdGeS0 VJ3g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=gPEudKMX; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e26si3176780edv.153.2021.01.14.09.12.20; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 09:12:51 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=gPEudKMX; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728580AbhANRKS (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 14 Jan 2021 12:10:18 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43204 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728530AbhANRKQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jan 2021 12:10:16 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-x62c.google.com (mail-pl1-x62c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93BAFC061574 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 09:09:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pl1-x62c.google.com with SMTP id j1so3227124pld.3 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 09:09:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=rulcIsdiEGHNoW8ESlRghH9XVhQcLihfLdJxeao6dAE=; b=gPEudKMXiAnTUPllVqz5JHuXDPhrkPRyyDCP6TWhPkV2VLEFPJeo4+7QYRUuu47tJ4 GGOBJGFXB7VczYpqJbHYqVKgX8pHp1aisSoUyuAxYzDAHfQJxN75INWVjrE9Wis+WJct HSyB/2vpVRGT2DeeUAon0m5LA087hcv2a2ewT32VsCMOVWRs5KAsCnozzkv9B0qczr9Q BBq5qABuLvTJJ/Kxpg2a069K1TbUgRVT+igbE0GZ3x2q2aVKeWLPfgXiJTkKvZI5aaij yx1HGaBNLh04MTMahsQ7Adotscw+8sVTFTv0ftXn8mB4KcPBPN72ZCmYoW2qiqjixsnx gxcw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=rulcIsdiEGHNoW8ESlRghH9XVhQcLihfLdJxeao6dAE=; b=PYZfaoDTJvRUxrFFk5674vCN39/DQGVcw7PEE4Xa24wmIjTfU+RQY/tXo9LzHHRig3 NhoM/MhkaYkirjDEZwPuW4bjCcTjAFCu3dbe0FmiyF3gK/61C/ge+FQoiyNWIrF5JVuo M8cmEGkuYTyMa6Zmi+lPq6QxWehFb0mlqiY1Z6Zq2Ixek25bs4FqQrlvwHEeLbPtcHe/ AnrowYDO7RpIzcmkFQ6VWJnAX5/XjTsy07V5IF1/lz5DNkamyPuBlXXEqGokxlYn9SHa gBoID3NILSo0eK8iw/PgwTekyCYWW+ROZzYj6JxAzTAbMVj6Yp2wNieaozsR6iFx8ZtU hlCg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5324ZiDt16zlpZDNA/I7q25M17630NcpF2ps5CHYa3mvntBJPNLO 6HvN5idUUdV3ESBClyWwgcJQEA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:b587:b029:de:23ed:88b1 with SMTP id a7-20020a170902b587b02900de23ed88b1mr8504338pls.61.1610644175995; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 09:09:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from google.com ([2620:15c:f:10:1ea0:b8ff:fe73:50f5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d36sm5952404pgm.77.2021.01.14.09.09.33 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 14 Jan 2021 09:09:35 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 09:09:28 -0800 From: Sean Christopherson To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Dave Hansen , Andy Lutomirski , Peter Zijlstra , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Wanpeng Li , Jim Mattson , Joerg Roedel , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tom Lendacky , Brijesh Singh Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/14] x86/cpufeatures: Assign dedicated feature word for AMD mem encryption Message-ID: References: <20210114003708.3798992-1-seanjc@google.com> <20210114003708.3798992-5-seanjc@google.com> <20210114113528.GC13213@zn.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210114113528.GC13213@zn.tnic> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 14, 2021, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 04:36:58PM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > Collect the scattered SME/SEV related feature flags into a dedicated > > word. There are now five recognized features in CPUID.0x8000001F.EAX, > > with at least one more on the horizon (SEV-SNP). Using a dedicated word > > allows KVM to use its automagic CPUID adjustment logic when reporting > > the set of supported features to userspace. > > > > No functional change intended. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson > > --- > > Subject should be: > > x86/cpufeatures: Assign dedicated feature word for CPUID_0x8000001F[EAX] > > but other than that, LGTM. > > Anything against me taking it through tip now? Hmm, patch 05/14 depends on the existence of the new word. That's a non-issue if you're planning on taking this for 5.11. If it's destined for 5.12, maybe get an ack from Paolo on patch 05 and take both through tip? I can drop them from this series when I send v3. In hindsight, I should have split these two patches into a separate mini-series from the get-go. Thanks!