Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 5 Nov 2001 07:24:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 5 Nov 2001 07:24:01 -0500 Received: from krusty.E-Technik.Uni-Dortmund.DE ([129.217.163.1]:2323 "HELO krusty.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 5 Nov 2001 07:23:48 -0500 Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 13:23:46 +0100 From: Matthias Andree To: lkml Subject: Re: disk throughput Message-ID: <20011105132346.B5805@emma1.emma.line.org> Mail-Followup-To: lkml In-Reply-To: <3BE5F5BF.7A249BDF@zip.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3BE5F5BF.7A249BDF@zip.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 04 Nov 2001, Andrew Morton wrote: > Numbers. The machine has 768 megs; the disk is IDE with a two meg cache. > The workload consists of untarring, tarring, diffing and removing kernel > trees. This filesystem is 21 gigs, and has 176 block groups. Does that IDE disk run with its write cache enabled or disabled? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/