Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:2785:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id ia5csp60862pxb; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 05:54:16 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy5Gz+X7owm7DSmA1p1iDOsg48ceKuTVjRKXze0OdIruvaMGzl5H3FvZXGZQ8Jtd5z3oRPg X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c1d2:: with SMTP id d18mr9567802edp.261.1610718856208; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 05:54:16 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1610718856; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Napug4uguQFzue+1yCw4QF6SST9e5KrmobgZ6951wx8KakgGBlSe4bLfnr+kf51TzE 3oFPVa0LZleVVn7+lBPjrlb9fxiptcBPphAYZyXS04ntikfgau+R8NmN/dLAF+f0Ygkl W8IU/LaYkwOFaFvQqIjMgV/h6ZeFXtg/yUWamV6U7kJlbK65sKF/SGyPcevU0XuvGDdn 8jBnf5ZApH40rxykdJkEuOO1rEj2eRMM4oeh5cUk2njZoeeMdjzePb7QutjaNr+IkCwJ qmxJJ3BkBdH2Tl1EIOfnmSf9rzvTmsUAiAiPxXUi/tnSZDlfwHaZYMtkxBgKtbsMm9oU 4Zqw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=GClJQCWfDVIp8Abu+51pXYFvR3+SULW6nqe1Zw2Nhco=; b=Mbi6/bM2TtdZFeWNBE440ZVEgfErPY191e0UZfl0sdp4z4hdwiOtC7uILUQc5OUUG7 kN/L+38eax+mE9xuP2Ww1mo45kyW6U3R6x8rTiYPNQW2iqptFbpT1F9bA/YSm0nbtZl7 Pk1qxPFRApVBciHGWnb/o5dt4uzp/MfdVQTWDRpsPVMDrbY/TMBAKSRndeckkjOpNyvQ APvKTGH9JPl244JTjq5tObhSveKaa+XQldwQq+ULcpZlrLaqfZXcL6a12JOKN/W2bU00 2K/RO/KCmVI1rIUsOfKN1JHRXTz+Qdek4IzoXRcXFbJ5pwfqHcDdYaA2fUvKiJylyEPm KTCw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b="F+C/Hx6r"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p1si2822389eds.205.2021.01.15.05.53.53; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 05:54:16 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b="F+C/Hx6r"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726019AbhAONvu (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 15 Jan 2021 08:51:50 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([63.128.21.124]:55609 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727719AbhAONvt (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jan 2021 08:51:49 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1610718623; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=GClJQCWfDVIp8Abu+51pXYFvR3+SULW6nqe1Zw2Nhco=; b=F+C/Hx6rDj6qxuWxoXF4UDZORvoqvomimmfQoOsHcoZKMBYGVHBSLExAifxSGlvAaOJJBl 9+lkUfyfYCNzsEn9TAbCqWGD+UhdB/3cSdgIoQMafk/NPnL9D8VPYFjPIgzaRRq34Bhjnb 4p+LlPZHWepEE14XN/D+inHv6mlglS0= Received: from mail-ej1-f72.google.com (mail-ej1-f72.google.com [209.85.218.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-496-Sw3FYx9nOvSkuVUxAwYhvw-1; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 08:50:21 -0500 X-MC-Unique: Sw3FYx9nOvSkuVUxAwYhvw-1 Received: by mail-ej1-f72.google.com with SMTP id b18so1612652ejz.6 for ; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 05:50:21 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=GClJQCWfDVIp8Abu+51pXYFvR3+SULW6nqe1Zw2Nhco=; b=lhy1FvY2IYT2oSCNBUpE+QCNMin9xorhrNbNCRSEyRN/RFYGTMWoKDaU9Wfs/8GNP5 AA6WFl+F5Mr8YATnzSFBZAuaCh0/axjzhJhJTUKZX4DkgSlDqok0lThQ4M95r6djV4jy VrYuozyPfr5QgKBqp9hPn9T1njiec8/NPJ2NcbT/nUWeN7MehImwCXgkZSsxBL/8w5fo w1fs8kIS42iPWW4NiA6BDDZeYxH2CFV3n0pInL6Jf9PlkjjDgpP3kM5hXxW7Mmx/UzLR rNeZUqmsXnO5VoG93N7FNHMboQ3fiBHUkjzNF6nII3oIpOTUkoMj90rHWi1T1Lb7haaw payw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533KkXp2stILNZj2h/JxAAvux5+LO4gCcrs7FJL3HQ/CBQnMgxGd Fn7PaE3V1KlQSZBzeltlpgNNdrsUfqLZWifZ/847MojgJO5rhpHlcOuottb+PlM5LYB7iEA9Dd8 QQFllf6Gh0J8pjyl1s9CUK17B X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:3f13:: with SMTP id hq19mr9060270ejc.142.1610718620211; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 05:50:20 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:3f13:: with SMTP id hq19mr9060257ejc.142.1610718620074; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 05:50:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:b07:6468:f312:c8dd:75d4:99ab:290a? ([2001:b07:6468:f312:c8dd:75d4:99ab:290a]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u2sm3461214ejb.65.2021.01.15.05.50.18 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 15 Jan 2021 05:50:19 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] KVM: x86: introduce definitions to support static calls for kvm_x86_ops To: Peter Zijlstra , Jason Baron Cc: seanjc@google.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Andrea Arcangeli References: From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <84b2f5ba-1a16-cb01-646c-37e25d659650@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 14:50:18 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 15/01/21 10:26, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >> +#define KVM_X86_OP(func) \ >> + DEFINE_STATIC_CALL_NULL(kvm_x86_##func, \ >> + *(((struct kvm_x86_ops *)0)->func)); >> +#define KVM_X86_OP_NULL KVM_X86_OP >> +#include >> +EXPORT_STATIC_CALL_GPL(kvm_x86_get_cs_db_l_bits); >> +EXPORT_STATIC_CALL_GPL(kvm_x86_cache_reg); >> +EXPORT_STATIC_CALL_GPL(kvm_x86_tlb_flush_current); > Would something like: > > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201110103909.GD2594@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net > > Be useful? That way modules can call the static_call() but not change > it. > Maybe not in these cases, but in general there may be cases where we later want to change the static_call (for example replacing jump labels with static_calls). Paolo