Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 15 Jan 2021 16:16:41 -0800
From:   Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To:     Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
        syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86/pmu: Fix UBSAN shift-out-of-bounds warning in
 intel_pmu_refresh()
Message-ID: <YAIwaZfxGQdDN1Cg@google.com>
References: <20201229071144.85418-1-like.xu@linux.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20201229071144.85418-1-like.xu@linux.intel.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Dec 29, 2020, Like Xu wrote:
> Since we know vPMU will not work properly when the guest bit_width(s) of
> the [gp|fixed] counters are greater than the host ones, so we can setup a
> smaller left shift value and refresh the guest pmu cpuid entry, thus fixing
> the following UBSAN shift-out-of-bounds warning:
> 
> shift exponent 197 is too large for 64-bit type 'long long unsigned int'
> 
> Call Trace:
>  __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:79 [inline]
>  dump_stack+0x107/0x163 lib/dump_stack.c:120
>  ubsan_epilogue+0xb/0x5a lib/ubsan.c:148
>  __ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds.cold+0xb1/0x181 lib/ubsan.c:395
>  intel_pmu_refresh.cold+0x75/0x99 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c:348
>  kvm_vcpu_after_set_cpuid+0x65a/0xf80 arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c:177
>  kvm_vcpu_ioctl_set_cpuid2+0x160/0x440 arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c:308
>  kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl+0x11b6/0x2d70 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:4709
>  kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x7b9/0xdb0 arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:3386
>  vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:48 [inline]
>  __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:753 [inline]
>  __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:739 [inline]
>  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x193/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:739
>  do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46
>  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
> 
> Reported-by: syzbot+ae488dc136a4cc6ba32b@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Signed-off-by: Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
> index a886a47daebd..a86a1690e75c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
> @@ -345,6 +345,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_refresh(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  
>  	pmu->nr_arch_gp_counters = min_t(int, eax.split.num_counters,
>  					 x86_pmu.num_counters_gp);
> +	eax.split.bit_width = min_t(int, eax.split.bit_width, x86_pmu.bit_width_gp);
>  	pmu->counter_bitmask[KVM_PMC_GP] = ((u64)1 << eax.split.bit_width) - 1;
>  	pmu->available_event_types = ~entry->ebx &
>  					((1ull << eax.split.mask_length) - 1);

eax.split.mask_length needs similar treatment, doesn't it?

> @@ -355,6 +356,8 @@ static void intel_pmu_refresh(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  		pmu->nr_arch_fixed_counters =
>  			min_t(int, edx.split.num_counters_fixed,
>  			      x86_pmu.num_counters_fixed);
> +		edx.split.bit_width_fixed = min_t(int,
> +			edx.split.bit_width_fixed, x86_pmu.bit_width_fixed);
>  		pmu->counter_bitmask[KVM_PMC_FIXED] =
>  			((u64)1 << edx.split.bit_width_fixed) - 1;
>  	}
> -- 
> 2.29.2
>