Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp887790pxb; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 10:24:50 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxtlHRlWfIK3GEX14zIXL1CjQbGAaGSHQjSMrm1ipL6fcnLnu2ItYy4DX3eLnMshb9Y25x9 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:890:: with SMTP id n16mr11565750eje.195.1610821490353; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 10:24:50 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1610821490; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=G/iYrxOfOaO6dMJRyV6yv1pSoSixfnuA9Nf5BOoK6ST69Plx6K6J6CUAFKZWN+zZqg XGvhJkTHqUy2hdlW/4sJp7pkPWnyt+I1Kfjq4OTQaZAqDaq/VMg+tDXS7db5UXL///vv 5yjY9mhpZrK01whgjn3wO065WfEDvCGp1OUfAsD6khdfq9ev0MjChsJq5kivG27TVIym 4ZFcO5mXeSOD8SOHT8/93tirwiTlBgRieUuL/Wi7KIYCXDcNcMjyjBSPwLPA2d0LikQ/ ho9edehf71h1os2fegdcE8r8U7ls0JWbjRTBdRxym1ea9NY6vAFhkXoHqrVngkog0nJ0 hmpQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=arOay+YwtS+tDlEZ81Z+UeSkXOp7/u48sL+a7Ve1btA=; b=qQ4XyWYoSNVUjbzv1ZyByHW5W2QOjLE0FIn+ytd50hXqXRX8BtxYWk0LBSpFwfznKB BgtjFV+y0UBfzptBAtuG/G/JIJis5g0LGgoogJ//3FwwVGlfVoqaefXZbdyhcbkDHv/9 WUuTo1NE9f+bCuaiZqIsShOiNWJOxu+NSkcuGdVhap4bKwRtNPWQLOUTshHcJDFwXUPV +R6++dhk65+wKmGBkG+P+YDPUSYUCfygtqBKWLYTqIONX7HdIYmhUlwbLA/1TBGNrzYA quv+xDPbjzFqgV5Z79CQrYs88b/QLac8jbP5ADciol+BdZY1TWqCWmvIz+WQTh4gNnPT NrpA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z2si6037389ede.501.2021.01.16.10.24.26; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 10:24:50 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727910AbhAPSW5 (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 16 Jan 2021 13:22:57 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:56668 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727868AbhAPSWz (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Jan 2021 13:22:55 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92A97101E; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 10:22:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from e107158-lin.cambridge.arm.com (e107158-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.194.78]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4415C3F70D; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 10:22:08 -0800 (PST) From: Qais Yousef To: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org Cc: Alexei Starovoitov , Andrii Nakryiko , Daniel Borkmann , Yonghong Song , Steven Rostedt , "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Qais Yousef Subject: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 2/2] selftests: bpf: Add a new test for bare tracepoints Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2021 18:21:33 +0000 Message-Id: <20210116182133.2286884-3-qais.yousef@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20210116182133.2286884-1-qais.yousef@arm.com> References: <20210116182133.2286884-1-qais.yousef@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Reuse module_attach infrastructure to add a new bare tracepoint to check we can attach to it as a raw tracepoint. Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef --- .../bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod-events.h | 6 +++++ .../selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c | 21 ++++++++++++++- .../selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h | 6 +++++ .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/module_attach.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++ .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_module_attach.c | 10 +++++++ 5 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod-events.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod-events.h index b83ea448bc79..89c6d58e5dd6 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod-events.h +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod-events.h @@ -28,6 +28,12 @@ TRACE_EVENT(bpf_testmod_test_read, __entry->pid, __entry->comm, __entry->off, __entry->len) ); +/* A bare tracepoint with no event associated with it */ +DECLARE_TRACE(bpf_testmod_test_write_bare, + TP_PROTO(struct task_struct *task, struct bpf_testmod_test_write_ctx *ctx), + TP_ARGS(task, ctx) +); + #endif /* _BPF_TESTMOD_EVENTS_H */ #undef TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c index 2df19d73ca49..e900adad2276 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c @@ -28,9 +28,28 @@ bpf_testmod_test_read(struct file *file, struct kobject *kobj, EXPORT_SYMBOL(bpf_testmod_test_read); ALLOW_ERROR_INJECTION(bpf_testmod_test_read, ERRNO); +noinline ssize_t +bpf_testmod_test_write(struct file *file, struct kobject *kobj, + struct bin_attribute *bin_attr, + char *buf, loff_t off, size_t len) +{ + struct bpf_testmod_test_write_ctx ctx = { + .buf = buf, + .off = off, + .len = len, + }; + + trace_bpf_testmod_test_write_bare(current, &ctx); + + return -EIO; /* always fail */ +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(bpf_testmod_test_write); +ALLOW_ERROR_INJECTION(bpf_testmod_test_write, ERRNO); + static struct bin_attribute bin_attr_bpf_testmod_file __ro_after_init = { - .attr = { .name = "bpf_testmod", .mode = 0444, }, + .attr = { .name = "bpf_testmod", .mode = 0666, }, .read = bpf_testmod_test_read, + .write = bpf_testmod_test_write, }; static int bpf_testmod_init(void) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h index b81adfedb4f6..b3892dc40111 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h @@ -11,4 +11,10 @@ struct bpf_testmod_test_read_ctx { size_t len; }; +struct bpf_testmod_test_write_ctx { + char *buf; + loff_t off; + size_t len; +}; + #endif /* _BPF_TESTMOD_H */ diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/module_attach.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/module_attach.c index 50796b651f72..e4605c0b5af1 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/module_attach.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/module_attach.c @@ -21,9 +21,34 @@ static int trigger_module_test_read(int read_sz) return 0; } +static int trigger_module_test_write(int write_sz) +{ + int fd, err; + char *buf = malloc(write_sz); + + if (!buf) + return -ENOMEM; + + memset(buf, 'a', write_sz); + buf[write_sz-1] = '\0'; + + fd = open("/sys/kernel/bpf_testmod", O_WRONLY); + err = -errno; + if (CHECK(fd < 0, "testmod_file_open", "failed: %d\n", err)) + goto out; + + write(fd, buf, write_sz); + close(fd); +out: + free(buf); + + return 0; +} + void test_module_attach(void) { const int READ_SZ = 456; + const int WRITE_SZ = 457; struct test_module_attach* skel; struct test_module_attach__bss *bss; int err; @@ -48,8 +73,10 @@ void test_module_attach(void) /* trigger tracepoint */ ASSERT_OK(trigger_module_test_read(READ_SZ), "trigger_read"); + ASSERT_OK(trigger_module_test_write(WRITE_SZ), "trigger_write"); ASSERT_EQ(bss->raw_tp_read_sz, READ_SZ, "raw_tp"); + ASSERT_EQ(bss->raw_tp_bare_write_sz, WRITE_SZ, "raw_tp_bare"); ASSERT_EQ(bss->tp_btf_read_sz, READ_SZ, "tp_btf"); ASSERT_EQ(bss->fentry_read_sz, READ_SZ, "fentry"); ASSERT_EQ(bss->fentry_manual_read_sz, READ_SZ, "fentry_manual"); diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_module_attach.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_module_attach.c index efd1e287ac17..bd37ceec5587 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_module_attach.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_module_attach.c @@ -17,6 +17,16 @@ int BPF_PROG(handle_raw_tp, return 0; } +__u32 raw_tp_bare_write_sz = 0; + +SEC("raw_tp/bpf_testmod_test_write_bare") +int BPF_PROG(handle_raw_tp_bare, + struct task_struct *task, struct bpf_testmod_test_write_ctx *write_ctx) +{ + raw_tp_bare_write_sz = BPF_CORE_READ(write_ctx, len); + return 0; +} + __u32 tp_btf_read_sz = 0; SEC("tp_btf/bpf_testmod_test_read") -- 2.25.1