Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp2098244pxb; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 08:11:21 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwZf/yMAvyAyAoVxSgF4BuBZr89+prgMuOheua3R7fza2J3unIrz91aBqyBtHS6WHjIJmQu X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1b11:: with SMTP id by17mr122726edb.373.1610986280958; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 08:11:20 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1610986280; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=T7mKCKamVeN/r4BGlUiHltcgdCMI8WQon/g2dVzX9wmN1pv4gZD41RYpH4uy9M1Nc0 WOqpnUn7QfWjtx8rniPbu0lmsdFa3kCrkGwj7EXy6nXBMisPA1XqaAF+OmN01WnyeNMU JOb+FureXbA0cCryY+WZ3uFL6jKoUgmqpqwSepk8fo+Rc7lXwtHkfjxsr5I9u+Dy38sw ePL3LYrc8cye6Cp6UFSGfsIX9+fk4E/TF6tvd08k5a3HzL9L1bJDGOxXizLDYnK/xGfg VBLDE1rOmrRNJQcZ4LRQJALdKeEnuf0jMPk9lK8Ndp3APq63l5iswELIHK1frI6gIZhF 1ozw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:message-id:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:date:content-transfer-encoding:dkim-signature :mime-version; bh=w7ujA7+I6bTEbomZ9OiizFcTd0sfAWA+va//aLjd560=; b=in2lPe9lUmNqUOgeCyFLTShIDteBnEM0dIzWAZ462Gb5mXFaZ51UyrpLEZHGD5L2zF QFeiwd0nFamzp3YklFq7KPTpU5Ew5o1l9/UlZqGqM0UMhxzDTg8wsn1IE6umTsWeDBTS w2MGxjqMWafOoki8qkMSMD2i7F3rMfuvIXzTWaTDc0c7TTk92F3bsMKEdXxD3R2feZ9X mHeeSdS+xEVdV6lIFs3f0vObcpWiAoBrXuXPcACwEmMgrkNwRM9lJt5bLj8hxUlY+9Ep YXYf8B8BYsWdOuwTCkWmm6jXAGArGOWAPR7w+sR14dEsW4okBtLGv/5ghwPL9nqGsAmG bGfg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@firemail.cc header.s=mail header.b=ZWWUMge3; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p26si5214935eji.9.2021.01.18.08.10.49; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 08:11:18 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@firemail.cc header.s=mail header.b=ZWWUMge3; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2406275AbhARQGN (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 18 Jan 2021 11:06:13 -0500 Received: from mail.cock.li ([37.120.193.124]:38024 "EHLO mail.cock.li" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2406409AbhARQGG (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jan 2021 11:06:06 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=firemail.cc; s=mail; t=1610985908; bh=jqUAsJIcf+7bOgA4AuJUqx7RYM3DAcDTD3ywveeWwJU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ZWWUMge3Ucy4G9IWpMgu5EATATbaVR4CAlfLhXDzPLGrb2C4ee85/ZwRZSX4hzGhX kxDR5zc6ohiRdU2HZt24lTF/111Vmut/w4L804k1mkLfB/FHCbq3aC3pcpqAa8dAXl cG9mI6qFTujvNa/Hb3SYIHJ6Ob93WBvfbhKpmNYFIOdp2XSatpxhPD3MJtJUmlCdy1 POgDAAM5F7u+tKIQQ+l6jVfHzWQX1RKbScNbmV4YottzLQGI5GJ8d1Vmz4nv94wxDL zaQ2dr1zLROYFCTeJjfTub39cZapwD3xJwZ6VBFBLPF/LEAgR7wo4Eizb15vrg238d /YrJ7B48aE73A== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 16:05:09 +0000 From: nipponmail@firemail.cc To: Boris Lukashev Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linksys WRT54G and the GPL - What about GRSECURITY? In-Reply-To: References: <018895af6127043324ce34c8faceac42@firemail.cc> Message-ID: X-Sender: nipponmail@firemail.cc User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.15 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > First off, its no longer even accurate Wrong. Grsecurity is violating the Linux Copyright by preventing redistribution, by adding additional terms between it and distributees. It does not matter if Linus, the weak faggot, is "never going to include" it. Grsecurity is violating the GCC copyright for the same reason. > The whole GPL mess is broken, clearly, and nobody is looking to > enforce it - industry is waiting it out till Redox and BSDs become It doesn't FUCKING matter what the "INDUSTRY" is doing or wants. You techies are FUCKING FAGGOTS. YOU own the COPYRIGHT to whatever you "contributed" to Linux (you never signed over your copyrights). It does N O T matter what your fucking "bosses" in "DUH INDUSTRY" want you to do or do not want you to do. YOU can and HAVE TO SUE. I hate you fucking people for your inaction. You're like a hive mind of weak castrated scum. 'DURR OUR 'peer' ARE AGAINST IT SO WE CAN DO NOTHING' - White Tech __FAGGOTS__ > Apologies to actual homosexuals... using this word "faggot" is an > affront to you: > since it compares you to weak white quisling males > but english doesn't give many options I just hate you people. You just let it happen. Then you cope "well, we weren't going to include it anyway". ----- Additionally:Linus, for years, induced others to assist him in his work on his kernel, by claiming that those who violated the share-and-share alike provisions of the license would be sued. He explained AT LENGHT the "deal": you contribute code, if anyone modifies it they cannot close the code, if they violate that they will be sued. This is what he told his supporters and those who helped him. A reasonable person would surmise that Linus was making a promise to sue violators of the Linux Kernel License. INSTEAD: He is paid 1.3 million dollars per year, and does not say a word. (What is he being paid for? We can guess: To forgo the legal right to sue? To NOT encourage suits? To DISCOURAGE suits?) That is: The linux kernel contributors detrimentally relied on Linus' words: his false promise of action. Yes: he should be punished. They would not have done the programming work without those false statements of Linus' On 2021-01-17 21:58, Boris Lukashev wrote: > Why do you send this stuff to people? > First off, its no longer even accurate - grsec code _changes_ to Linux > have been deemed as "never to be adopted" by Linus. Without those > changes, their GCC plugins can't work properly, and those plugins are > part of the build-toolchain, not the C source. So even if you gave > them a billion dollars tomorrow, Linux would still never use the work. > The whole GPL mess is broken, clearly, and nobody is looking to > enforce it - industry is waiting it out till Redox and BSDs become > more viable for production OS. > So why send these emails? Venting purposes? > > On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 1:03 PM wrote: > >> Linus etc do not give a FUCK that Grsecurity is BLATANTLY violating >> the >> GPL. So why do you fucking retards complain about this? >>> DURR BECUAUSE WE DON'T HAVE 2 DO ANYTHING, CAN JUST COMMISERATE >> >> ( >> > https://perens.com/2017/06/28/warning-grsecurity-potential-contributory-infringement-risk-for-customers/ >> >> ) > > -- > > Boris Lukashev > Systems Architect > Semper Victus [1] > > > Links: > ------ > [1] https://www.sempervictus.com