Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] software_node: Add kernel-doc comments to exported
 symbols
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, rafael@kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com
References: <20210113000209.322218-1-djrscally@gmail.com>
 <20210118094945.GX11878@paasikivi.fi.intel.com>
 <20210118103355.GZ4077@smile.fi.intel.com>
From:   Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <0c433f0a-3ae5-1956-988c-9f4dfdb79fbc@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 18 Jan 2021 10:35:26 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20210118103355.GZ4077@smile.fi.intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Precedence: bulk

On 18/01/2021 10:33, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 11:49:46AM +0200, Sakari Ailus wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 12:02:09AM +0000, Daniel Scally wrote:
>>> + * to_software_node() - Fetch software node associated with a firmware node handle
>> Please wrap lines over 80 (unless there's a reason to keep them longer).
> Does kernel-doc behave good when you wrap the function summary line?
> My impression that summary should be one line.
>
Same, but I can shorten the line by s/associated with/linked to or
something along those lines