Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
IronPort-SDR: lWHaNGI0fEk8EESmn4AnKcEc9XN7qMxX+R6+LFy+0gHb0j2q+NFzwRKLUmD0YMug/c8cExj4zV
 CQcl7+nFVA3A==
IronPort-SDR: XNsg8r+7X51sKJdWzEP/HXibKgWg2YheMWmfaX+Ki6PgAh528fj6VYxgm++ot2Sm74MRpYYjrA
 sgoMmGzjibXg==
Date:   Mon, 18 Jan 2021 12:33:55 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To:     Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com>, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
        rafael@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] software_node: Add kernel-doc comments to exported
 symbols
Message-ID: <20210118103355.GZ4077@smile.fi.intel.com>
References: <20210113000209.322218-1-djrscally@gmail.com>
 <20210118094945.GX11878@paasikivi.fi.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210118094945.GX11878@paasikivi.fi.intel.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 11:49:46AM +0200, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 12:02:09AM +0000, Daniel Scally wrote:

> > + * to_software_node() - Fetch software node associated with a firmware node handle
> 
> Please wrap lines over 80 (unless there's a reason to keep them longer).

Does kernel-doc behave good when you wrap the function summary line?
My impression that summary should be one line.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko