Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp2501563pxb; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 21:21:41 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy3owt/wHM/zriUqcrhTvYmLoGpW/bc59KfMciLDfQ5EY01JsyxnLPP962Bk6zoG+f7PUP0 X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:d8b:: with SMTP id go11mr1875675ejc.303.1611033700845; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 21:21:40 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1611033700; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=KeHFlq1ajBzMGWLvrGtdSBOuz8NQeIQwwj7cfaLke/8Sn3p1gjj+iGDwDzQCRCMxUy Psor7l0CcRKaZ+foLg281iaHC11syFiEdZ9Ep2khHPh1HTuCq7CMx8t1zNbymumRzHfA l1eELD7V/PQMnEgO1UkyqjbLeu9xEaTg6E+XExoOD1IYL6ojpPUwnMCnwn64QCaHvua1 BCv7H+NsYCk0mpEsfGzfYTeeGLbZvkdcsfIDSXT1Gy6tsbVC3yTWHyFqQIlddbjVQHUz RnB86NikLeJXnqnb/UlNHXLQ93MrHEgsP0KeeWHFbgMpIIQel+PDLRimq63OiYEsb7ED +gqg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=COpFk8JVoGfb4E3tmL/piUQieYNkIMUogv9fM2rWfEQ=; b=e9s/rKTTdn6IA9i68NN0R00WcCQrstCKS2xEN+dSWeJ2XmD4DaLePM1faEnkD2SpoE +GcYnuuwEBClNApVXs3f4n4fDL+3nVurvqf97zGKopz1NNScs95PGs3IOwxUEwQ9l0ZC Cu89Oqn9f/VbP4Qm3DnSZW1nh9ZFMjUuQ8y82f9NAmy7MNy6Si4IHlDnnGeG6fY19oSL yMGHOBaDJT/rWXBYqKNhiLSTJmuk0vI4NiwhRihaC5qH2ZCnjq1nCSZWbiFxTa9+QnmQ yHpLagf6r3bBEMZkXM6/RhGoC8+QJlFngVisQ87sFQpKYP5wlFQ+TmzL5IU/xYiIzTaR Bh5A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=dzMYdiMm; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id os13si7700390ejb.680.2021.01.18.21.21.17; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 21:21:40 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=dzMYdiMm; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2394574AbhARVU2 (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 18 Jan 2021 16:20:28 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57880 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2394538AbhARVUH (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jan 2021 16:20:07 -0500 Received: from mail-yb1-xb2c.google.com (mail-yb1-xb2c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b2c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD963C061574 for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 13:19:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-yb1-xb2c.google.com with SMTP id p185so2795175ybg.8 for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 13:19:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=COpFk8JVoGfb4E3tmL/piUQieYNkIMUogv9fM2rWfEQ=; b=dzMYdiMm/qt2fGRQnCVarFPn+P9JZKC8QVxYZEUP4jo3StRHoS2SJXltwbYZVoqn9V 6WUQMsaka5XlT1trnLxHHGUfSp7HawAXe05IOId6xy/DMaYYsCV40Sm2yiRWJjzK5IJI 6mhq28awJQOorY+0FGmleW+pOwhBkkhDJo/kSfNcYlM7yrFg/6CxYhu3C5KKXtJXWc43 UxR3ofLCV+9Y3xlvZlWlRNhJGvqX15egcIkepBnCe6cqi2o+Q7v5e/LIprwTXkJYrbKe uCCS2dcJMQYdJil9bxvtOMmkZVdRoer1sHynRyr37MFGBnVJyIW3NyvEnLElKuTI7USh WwUg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=COpFk8JVoGfb4E3tmL/piUQieYNkIMUogv9fM2rWfEQ=; b=QaYT3vUrsszL2d731JRGE68JPey50w7oNrDU/DCdw/bvsIq6Za4kTYxzmYuE5cSptQ dHdH4zwz65pc230duCA6eSW/UcdmokOxJp8CXIDgLODjrQ8Q/zZRrrX1gtXqrh2iroMu g9slLwgtemUt3q0WYY0e7Ja6mIjwRaNv0Ru+bcfjuQH8hlTzUKqugrTjsXqglGYfhrv1 iojm75Gy2MDKPr6jgujt71sYTIUfGauztRygkypWQ4+3uMMEVs5OV4a2115S1W8oSP6L ugGqor8oaq3RCzR8DBkZQfPxT0MtOjr5X97EIEcYsSPbGPmUL8h4SMMMrXYXl6slFxv6 fZoA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532AUwCfAuTMNq1AujWdkRbW2dkVZ/0wRXIbk9/DawQ+qsK6J6jD esH+s48kncrFD3Qkj1q7JJLNZgPIOxKXyRzA38/hMw== X-Received: by 2002:a25:77d4:: with SMTP id s203mr1731889ybc.32.1611004765635; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 13:19:25 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20201218031703.3053753-1-saravanak@google.com> <20201218031703.3053753-6-saravanak@google.com> <86db7747ea6d48eebbf40a5855240d14@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: From: Saravana Kannan Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 13:18:49 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 5/5] driver core: Set fw_devlink=on by default To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Marc Zyngier , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Android Kernel Team , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Jisheng Zhang , Kevin Hilman , John Stultz , Nicolas Saenz Julienne , Yoshihiro Shimoda , Linux-Renesas Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 11:16 AM Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > Hi Marc, > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 6:59 PM Marc Zyngier wrote: > > On 2021-01-18 17:39, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 4:34 AM Saravana Kannan > > > wrote: > > >> Cyclic dependencies in some firmware was one of the last remaining > > >> reasons fw_devlink=on couldn't be set by default. Now that cyclic > > >> dependencies don't block probing, set fw_devlink=on by default. > > >> > > >> Setting fw_devlink=on by default brings a bunch of benefits > > >> (currently, > > >> only for systems with device tree firmware): > > >> * Significantly cuts down deferred probes. > > >> * Device probe is effectively attempted in graph order. > > >> * Makes it much easier to load drivers as modules without having to > > >> worry about functional dependencies between modules (depmod is still > > >> needed for symbol dependencies). > > >> > > >> If this patch prevents some devices from probing, it's very likely due > > >> to the system having one or more device drivers that "probe"/set up a > > >> device (DT node with compatible property) without creating a struct > > >> device for it. If we hit such cases, the device drivers need to be > > >> fixed so that they populate struct devices and probe them like normal > > >> device drivers so that the driver core is aware of the devices and > > >> their > > >> status. See [1] for an example of such a case. > > >> > > >> [1] - > > >> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAGETcx9PiX==mLxB9PO8Myyk6u2vhPVwTMsA5NkD-ywH5xhusw@mail.gmail.com/ > > >> Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan > > > > > > Shimoda-san reported that next-20210111 and later fail to boot > > > on Renesas R-Car Gen3 platforms. No output is seen, unless earlycon > > > is enabled. > > > > > > I have bisected this to commit e590474768f1cc04 ("driver core: Set > > > fw_devlink=on by default"). > > > > There is a tentative patch from Saravana here[1], which works around > > some issues on my RK3399 platform, and it'd be interesting to find > > out whether that helps on your system. > > > > Thanks, > > > > M. > > > > [1] > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210116011412.3211292-1-saravanak@google.com > > Thanks for the suggestion, but given no devices probe (incl. GPIO > providers), I'm afraid it won't help. [testing] Indeed. > > With the debug prints in device_links_check_suppliers enabled, and > some postprocessing, I get: > > 255 supplier e6180000.system-controller not ready > 9 supplier fe990000.iommu not ready > 9 supplier fe980000.iommu not ready > 6 supplier febd0000.iommu not ready > 6 supplier ec670000.iommu not ready > 3 supplier febe0000.iommu not ready > 3 supplier e7740000.iommu not ready > 3 supplier e6740000.iommu not ready > 3 supplier e65ee000.usb-phy not ready > 3 supplier e6570000.iommu not ready > 3 supplier e6054000.gpio not ready > 3 supplier e6053000.gpio not ready > > As everything is part of a PM Domain, the (lack of the) system controller > must be the culprit. What's wrong with it? It is registered very early in > the boot: > > [ 0.142096] rcar_sysc_pd_init:442: of_genpd_add_provider_onecell() returned 0 Hi Geert, Thanks for reporting the issue. Looks like you found the important logs. Can you please enable all these logs and send the early con logs as an attachment (so I don't need to deal with lines getting wrapped)? 1. The ones in device_links_check_suppliers() 2. The ones in device_link_add() 3. initcall_debug=1 That should help us figure out what's going on. Also, what's the DT that corresponds to one of the boards that see this issue? Lastly, can you please pick up these 3 patches (some need clean up before they merge) to make sure it's not an issue being worked on from other bug reports? https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210116011412.3211292-1-saravanak@google.com/ https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210115210159.3090203-1-saravanak@google.com/ https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201218210750.3455872-1-saravanak@google.com/ I have a strong hunch the 2nd one will fix your issues. fw_devlink can handle cyclic dependencies now (it basically reverts to fw_devlink=permissive mode for devices in the cycle), but it needs to "see" all the dependencies to know there's a cycle. So want to make sure it "sees" the "gpios" binding used all over some of the Renesas DT files. Thanks, Saravana