Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp3161563pxb; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 15:48:58 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz7oHYdj+US3BBQQY2wN9wHfMqFDpL9kNyrH299ZN/0N1CMEgRtZ7fQ0GetD7Gp0pQXxvkg X-Received: by 2002:a50:bf4a:: with SMTP id g10mr5076186edk.201.1611100138065; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 15:48:58 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1611100138; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=DVkK4bp0NlnTsV0stmxBlfsJAW5r4jOmbbhMhkjkVkce/t86hR+adXPX7zCeBE/y7j xtZ+i4bff4Vb0MnIvuc3Tw/70E2GbFfPsiohWM8QT7BXywo/rQpJj9NNtrdmjXWndXOq 2LPsIdVYShjreOqaMUqvRimJFH2L4CDp3tZuH7z7dWIqQFmjDby5kkZCxk6Ogajae2Hf 1bbw3R6tnOBxi9KgDUGZCMyiegBkzty5pY7p37LPq1j1pbBtQ3mGmYHrITY/UapYnr9V jH42dW0gpv0x6iTtAT+RBXytQPetaatiFF5XhIAsxrE6YQERfLtYzTuNv1HYbTMzf1hT dkkA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=D/G1m8PE0YTql3WtklqLcJoolwHbP1jsFDu8kUqAsjk=; b=mJfM6Tzz1Ntci5lLlu/L0cq6tj3c1ph+HPK8ZHNEokHQ/T+rvlhnHwoJHnyuXVDRZt 8QL2YchIZ3wqiqYEdkHYUf4Pz/ilhYI9TIvItU0M0LBTSt7Dyk7VCK5I8o4afCETlNfA +hg3SlkkEqXnwN0LpZq0VdDPcy2GQ5LK/042LCEZFExmFBK+qvisL98tebm/Cw62BwSK 9q56Jwx4c62TicXizS5mZiENwBAiqUvgpYITifPcNl7ESyBCajRTxVBVoNQ+u/rH9k/y LtRGMPtrGtFdElbUrVQ1iFwvtd/juYdliFXr5012o5qumdpbgJydRrkyrGN/PhZQikyH Z+AQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@cloudflare.com header.s=google header.b=ElJArjSc; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=cloudflare.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id lo2si106792ejb.37.2021.01.19.15.48.31; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 15:48:58 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@cloudflare.com header.s=google header.b=ElJArjSc; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=cloudflare.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726840AbhASXpV (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 19 Jan 2021 18:45:21 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59938 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730629AbhASXoo (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jan 2021 18:44:44 -0500 Received: from mail-lf1-x12d.google.com (mail-lf1-x12d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31329C061575 for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 15:43:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lf1-x12d.google.com with SMTP id h7so2372655lfc.6 for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 15:43:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cloudflare.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=D/G1m8PE0YTql3WtklqLcJoolwHbP1jsFDu8kUqAsjk=; b=ElJArjScwx6VrNY8cu9sHOG+hiNtxsnqba7p4lx6dFH6orCd9GDBiEhH96Aq6cEBM3 o6gAA8i9eDCDdI1OYb9wrfKSIU6eP28xBrlScg4CYzkYpIzqGMV6kIsOT/VPoZZa9D04 Plw2hA6RvBQbDqA+6AlNWDro5DYmxEdSHG97Y= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=D/G1m8PE0YTql3WtklqLcJoolwHbP1jsFDu8kUqAsjk=; b=PhXVADwsCHbGaId697JkNA3lh1QilrHTMTximuIIqLuJVhubshHm54rN85o9lyN133 lGYhjkaVRrS83Khet54ylXVnQeBIm/ejbfvxgD2yQD3Z8epOxM5mAfkyCYWEUvqLBF7V UYt6d6ywfm9jKm3by5HWmIxhN3sHdYurzlu06g25teSskK7Nt4cC7AVE1aLMO63QyjAy KxzuoXk8fVl7ohtWAuZUdwf5ejfy7g5wj1zUCtb1lQGCG4l0DlgkQfIRZK9PloUI413e c5/of7SgupoxzrwQebBuv3Jvb5LuwqICu3c05d5oHGwiKRAA4LRTeLrDe/Uw2X80mOy5 rfFA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531Vn9EfpOlTBpIxQ52cxNhl8K0bpmo7O383KyTQXRp5YZSEzB0s QpNtOkTObK90TSIaRQVIAPlmW/UgO4M8ME4OKkKA1MyEVhJLXA== X-Received: by 2002:a19:670f:: with SMTP id b15mr2808464lfc.340.1611099834522; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 15:43:54 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20201215012907.3062-1-ivan@cloudflare.com> <20201217101441.3d5085f3@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> In-Reply-To: <20201217101441.3d5085f3@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> From: Ivan Babrou Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 15:43:43 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] sfc: reduce the number of requested xdp ev queues To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers , linux-kernel , bpf@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team , Edward Cree , Martin Habets , "David S. Miller" , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Jesper Dangaard Brouer , John Fastabend Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 10:14 AM Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Mon, 14 Dec 2020 17:29:06 -0800 Ivan Babrou wrote: > > Without this change the driver tries to allocate too many queues, > > breaching the number of available msi-x interrupts on machines > > with many logical cpus and default adapter settings: > > > > Insufficient resources for 12 XDP event queues (24 other channels, max 32) > > > > Which in turn triggers EINVAL on XDP processing: > > > > sfc 0000:86:00.0 ext0: XDP TX failed (-22) > > > > Signed-off-by: Ivan Babrou > > Looks like the discussion may have concluded, but we don't take -next > patches during the merge window, so please repost when net-next reopens. > > Thanks! > -- > # Form letter - net-next is closed > > We have already sent the networking pull request for 5.11 and therefore > net-next is closed for new drivers, features, code refactoring and > optimizations. We are currently accepting bug fixes only. > > Please repost when net-next reopens after 5.11-rc1 is cut. Should I resend my patch now that the window is open or is bumping this thread enough? > Look out for the announcement on the mailing list or check: > http://vger.kernel.org/~davem/net-next.html > > RFC patches sent for review only are obviously welcome at any time.