Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 20 Jan 2021 10:36:06 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To:     Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
        Bill Mills <bill.mills@linaro.org>, anmar.oueja@linaro.org,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: unittest: Statically apply overlays using fdtoverlay
Message-ID: <20210120050606.b2m4jssh73wexybx@vireshk-i7>
References: <1e42183ccafa1afba33b3e79a4e3efd3329fd133.1610095159.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
 <20210119022154.2338781-1-frowand.list@gmail.com>
 <20210119080546.dzec3jatsz2662qs@vireshk-i7>
 <f7133d16-510b-f730-a43b-89edab08aabe@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <f7133d16-510b-f730-a43b-89edab08aabe@gmail.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716-391-311a52
Precedence: bulk

On 19-01-21, 09:44, Frank Rowand wrote:
> No.  overlay_base.dts is intentionally compiled into a base FDT, not
> an overlay.  Unittest intentionally unflattens this FDT in early boot,
> in association with unflattening the system FDT.  One key intent
> behind this is to use the same memory allocation method that is
> used for the system FDT.
> 
> Do not try to convert overlay_base.dts into an overlay.

Okay, but why does it have /plugin/; specified in it then ?

And shouldn't we create two separate dtb-s now, static_test.dtb and
static_overlay_test.dtb ? As fdtoverlay will not be able to merge it with
testcase.dtb anyway.

Or maybe we can create another file static_overlay.dts (like testcases.dts)
which can include both testcases.dts and overlay_base.dts, and then we can
create static_test.dtb out of it ? That won't impact the runtime tests at all.

-- 
viresh