Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20210118034323.427029-1-namhyung@kernel.org> <YAVezkTtAkIAImzx@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <CAM9d7cgr+Vxq_SnEkSO5zU0QN-X6-LLJDKUfE4C72Nomnrr=+Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <YAWFkU+roDyMCgla@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <CAM9d7cg_Agin3C0iuigDzQjZEZNtVXPe9z9eaDZsdyNoVa_wxA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20210119024657.GA3526@tassilo.jf.intel.com> <CAM9d7chk5qC7er5EVmmrHZtP2PB6Y9EikfGYxYibE4HZpCOmbQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAM9d7chk5qC7er5EVmmrHZtP2PB6Y9EikfGYxYibE4HZpCOmbQ@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 20 Jan 2021 20:53:48 +0900
Message-ID: <CAM9d7cgE+Q-AfL2Fdi4rnv8rpTgi_qW0+iZVjG-0hL0sq+OouA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/core: Emit PERF_RECORD_LOST for pinned events
To:     Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
        Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
        Alexey Alexandrov <aalexand@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 12:11 PM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Andi,
>
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 11:47 AM Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > I don't think I object to having an even in the stream, but your LOST
> > > > event is unfortunate in that it itself can get lost when there's no
> > > > space in the buffer (which arguably is unlikely, but still).
> > > >
> > > > So from that point of view, I think overloading LOST is not so very nice
> > > > for this.
> > >
> > > But anything can get lost in case of no space.
> > > Do you want to use something other than the LOST event?
> >
> > Could always reserve the last entry in the ring buffer for a LOST event,
> > that would guarantee you can always get one out.
>
> A problem is that we can have more than one event that failed.
>
> In my understanding, we keep the lost count and add a LOST event
> when there's a space later.  So probably we can keep a list of the
> failed events and do similar for each event.  Or just use a single
> event to notify some number of events were failed.

Stephane suggested emitting an event for poll() like EPOLLERR or
EPOLLHUP.  I'll take a look at that.

Thanks,
Namhyung