Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20210118143932.56069-1-dong.menglong@zte.com.cn>
 <20210118143932.56069-4-dong.menglong@zte.com.cn> <20210120104621.GM19605@breakpoint.cc>
In-Reply-To: <20210120104621.GM19605@breakpoint.cc>
From:   Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 20 Jan 2021 21:28:11 +0800
Message-ID: <CADxym3aV9hy3UdnVWnLeLF6BnwqqrJ1MdMKNQiSa4sCWQ2+4ng@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] net: core: Namespace-ify sysctl_rmem_max and sysctl_wmem_max
To:     Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, christian.brauner@ubuntu.com,
        David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
        Menglong Dong <dong.menglong@zte.com.cn>, daniel@iogearbox.net,
        gnault@redhat.com, ast@kernel.org,
        Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>,
        ap420073@gmail.com, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, jakub@cloudflare.com,
        bjorn.topel@intel.com, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, rdna@fb.com,
        Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@google.com>,
        netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

Hello~

On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 6:46 PM Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> wrote:
>
> >
> > For that reason, make sysctl_wmem_max and sysctl_rmem_max
> > per-namespace.
>
> I think having those values be restricted by init netns is a desirable
> property.

I just thought that having these values per-namespace can be more flexible,
and users can have more choices. Is there any bad influence that I didn't
realize?

Thanks~
Menglong Dong