Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750788AbWINSIO (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Sep 2006 14:08:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750833AbWINSIO (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Sep 2006 14:08:14 -0400 Received: from smtp101.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([209.191.85.211]:23696 "HELO smtp101.mail.mud.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750788AbWINSIN (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Sep 2006 14:08:13 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.au; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:X-Accept-Language:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=FDjx0du1PWsggSJSyBZhnvFRrMNp+66lm1nSJiQiHe8k17oSsLuybAAVEyE34SW3lqP6M3gPLELatVCnIO5+h8ZRZybxQrEryw/0xu121w6UUMLYdGE3HBBtH/LkGD0YSRDwhqV7qG6rUmhnsga10LpYIbl++eYZtdjnpUU965Y= ; Message-ID: <45099A81.8060206@yahoo.com.au> Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 04:08:01 +1000 From: Nick Piggin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051007 Debian/1.7.12-1 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michel Dagenais CC: Roman Zippel , Ingo Molnar , Mathieu Desnoyers , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , Ingo Molnar , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Thomas Gleixner , Tom Zanussi , ltt-dev@shafik.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108 References: <20060914033826.GA2194@Krystal> <20060914112718.GA7065@elte.hu> <20060914135548.GA24393@elte.hu> <1158247596.5068.19.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1158247596.5068.19.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1023 Lines: 28 Michel Dagenais wrote: > On Thu, 2006-14-09 at 16:33 +0200, Roman Zippel wrote: >>BTW I don't mind KProbes as an option, but I have huge problem with making >>it the only option. > > > Indeed, KProbes SystemTAP and LTTng are complementary and people > involved in the three projects are cooperating. That doesn't mean we want them all in the kernel. The best aim would of course be to come up with a solution that has the advantages of all and disadvantages of none. That may be impossible, but if we can find one way to do things that is acceptable to all... What's the huge problem with making kprobes the only option (that can't be fixed by doing a bit of coding)? -- SUSE Labs, Novell Inc. Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/