Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp509321pxb; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 12:33:14 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxdBaE9X3PTC5Vs2bOGTJo/i3osJaM2A7y+z0A3RQjFniOMVTnvYjj5bUGFG5+FQGHfQBf5 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:278a:: with SMTP id b10mr6531981ede.347.1611174793960; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 12:33:13 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1611174793; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=cgTXkBFtqVczM+55byB1H4xckyyLayHwUr/S9V6C1pl1wq8+uiNoVgXUWPR7D0aZnk KIHX81IZ7cajqPmApou8+9Chv9Bz6OFyveE16U6VZ4bcEWeP7gjEJ2QhXUgdhVipMdlB 0d5eAxh0zwV70fA/x7dlv0Gb3FGhY/arBfaKyX6h8qfcqDRfC+1wBxd0Krz9vWHZSKiQ mqulaO/2zYDR7tVjGnL0I3l/iwRPVTLpVLwjTOQWuTouq83t9gNI1ekFrN7iCAnGMUDX x6YKvPW7QsoHymRGpI6zuu1vGpsDOLf7YAvqkZc45et/PCZnsvfhbaLqHuFDrLBaqyG1 Q4bw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:organization :from:references:cc:to:subject:reply-to:dkim-signature; bh=uPYHw73Fmba34UBZyndvbBrByJK/4y5p09JPYm1muXA=; b=RKNa0VjVjv3JTk0Thj4zLVZjRPQvi+k6ph7EuEErIq+0rMLrIBgW5uwIsI6wpaidUZ u3dEfrHViCwdj0QRfYHpJTDZlhPY8kY7bYRO9Wq9hGUVbXssPWMQDEjBlEyfqii5+4te /zd76XUpOIGPPHV5MTdco3DyTpMxP5LlLoyDihwT+SvXIXXwF/jCLcNcuWpgGPdRqOgi mZMXKLMtxCVQkzpANzIu8D9on2a8omPGevhy13TLyUe2KayOs30IiSDnbVU8qGb+yeqh GIERluqiE8vGgSrgK/RE4RDCu2fZH3189ZHRVuzgq/+eBVWj6ORqSwjMcQKZuAX3s00u EC5w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@6wind.com header.s=google header.b=C+zpEqhv; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d3si1236456edy.581.2021.01.20.12.32.48; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 12:33:13 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@6wind.com header.s=google header.b=C+zpEqhv; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2389949AbhATUb1 (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 20 Jan 2021 15:31:27 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46130 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2388372AbhATN5w (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jan 2021 08:57:52 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x334.google.com (mail-wm1-x334.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::334]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FD15C061575 for ; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 05:57:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm1-x334.google.com with SMTP id o10so3340414wmc.1 for ; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 05:57:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind.com; s=google; h=reply-to:subject:to:cc:references:from:organization:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=uPYHw73Fmba34UBZyndvbBrByJK/4y5p09JPYm1muXA=; b=C+zpEqhvLdsNn2ibhFJHfHzhXx2MWo9KXHJSJrEOwakVCegddGKa2WytX9x3E/aI1Y e4mJML6vkCwtCKNxsVEnsxgE/6KEWiUODcMfG7FIdWcwSeAnhrMcrSMufFYR+B9tXBNC 7iVG9hNTOhABm9+k0czfIftxx3VHSYFwA1gsd+IcDec5P/+4P2EYIvmpU4NwC7Up1tJ0 15jDaf95gyT4jJQRIxS6ypsiaIlsAD7YzvwwTC1F87DME3H4hRkgZBNO2hPMkB/YSm8h nSuSys3ERtAXnC4hQc5YzY1ToOdSxluhg5Yg3IxYjwYOENe/g8Mzyk1MgulXaO2+a3ov OC7Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:reply-to:subject:to:cc:references:from :organization:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=uPYHw73Fmba34UBZyndvbBrByJK/4y5p09JPYm1muXA=; b=cyQCL8tcM5Bh0Vq7J7+QR/7sQnFCgPj9TJMTSoJeYknLdaBXZ/m2uFNrdfSfju54/I 8UUjGbiACPdPLDIGgb9oSI342KXZPQV75OVhnt2P3GnvwsggeMYlkTfs3NuXSLaQr7l7 EXDacx6mCFxi8Myqk68wX+4k1GBA7KB9xWpg1fjFRJyUJofEoRi2ptwFpbsKCvOcMqnn VLUNVxf30RjOLWZXaR5ODDI5DNnMBBhfM3B7eP/RvG0Ljcx4OpTt6Z/P8c5/uj5odzzW KGoTU/pQp+DuGIMG/iGHup/ONw7a6+av9OKFqNqoOhq58J1eVWo/8TrS7NkhAfdCBYik xEIg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531me3UdjaYKq91Z1qCysIZTb2Z8HSsLXhNSDanxoEQUW164h0b7 uANdZCbGjZP0nTzbIqSmqLZIgP2aAp+1nwHarmQ= X-Received: by 2002:a1c:790f:: with SMTP id l15mr4560693wme.188.1611151028861; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 05:57:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2a01:e0a:410:bb00:853c:3c08:918b:153? ([2a01:e0a:410:bb00:853c:3c08:918b:153]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l20sm4622759wrh.82.2021.01.20.05.57.07 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 20 Jan 2021 05:57:08 -0800 (PST) Reply-To: nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] net: core: Namespace-ify sysctl_rmem_max and sysctl_wmem_max To: Menglong Dong , Florian Westphal Cc: Jakub Kicinski , christian.brauner@ubuntu.com, David Miller , Hideaki YOSHIFUJI , Menglong Dong , daniel@iogearbox.net, gnault@redhat.com, ast@kernel.org, ap420073@gmail.com, Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , jakub@cloudflare.com, bjorn.topel@intel.com, Kees Cook , viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, rdna@fb.com, Mahesh Bandewar , netdev , LKML References: <20210118143932.56069-1-dong.menglong@zte.com.cn> <20210118143932.56069-4-dong.menglong@zte.com.cn> <20210120104621.GM19605@breakpoint.cc> From: Nicolas Dichtel Organization: 6WIND Message-ID: <2e1eaded-f9e0-0da8-4dd9-0d459470cc95@6wind.com> Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 14:57:06 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Le 20/01/2021 à 14:28, Menglong Dong a écrit : [snip] >>> For that reason, make sysctl_wmem_max and sysctl_rmem_max >>> per-namespace. >> >> I think having those values be restricted by init netns is a desirable >> property. > > I just thought that having these values per-namespace can be more flexible, > and users can have more choices. Is there any bad influence that I didn't > realize? You can have a look here: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/1501495652.1876.17.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com/ https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20170726170333.24580-1-mcroce@redhat.com/ Regards, Nicolas