Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Thu, 21 Jan 2021 00:34:43 +0200
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To:     Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, haitao.huang@intel.com,
        Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>, x86@kernel.org,
        linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
        Jia Zhang <zhang.jia@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/sgx: Allows ioctl PROVISION to execute before CREATE
Message-ID: <YAiwA/oQkOVuTO+7@kernel.org>
References: <20210118133335.98907-1-tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>
 <YAc7h3zQR06eWPhZ@google.com>
 <5037ee56-0211-f16c-3ea0-86cf8146b7f8@linux.alibaba.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5037ee56-0211-f16c-3ea0-86cf8146b7f8@linux.alibaba.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 11:57:18AM +0800, Tianjia Zhang wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 1/20/21 4:05 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 18, 2021, Tianjia Zhang wrote:
> > > In function sgx_encl_create(), the logic of directly assigning
> > > value to attributes_mask determines that the call to
> > > SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_PROVISION must be after the command of
> > > SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_CREATE. If change this assignment statement to
> > > or operation, the PROVISION command can be executed earlier and
> > > more flexibly.
> > > 
> > > Reported-by: Jia Zhang <zhang.jia@linux.alibaba.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>
> > > ---
> > >   arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/ioctl.c | 2 +-
> > >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/ioctl.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/ioctl.c
> > > index f45957c05f69..0ca3fc238bc2 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/ioctl.c
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/ioctl.c
> > > @@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ static int sgx_encl_create(struct sgx_encl *encl, struct sgx_secs *secs)
> > >   	encl->base = secs->base;
> > >   	encl->size = secs->size;
> > >   	encl->attributes = secs->attributes;
> > > -	encl->attributes_mask = SGX_ATTR_DEBUG | SGX_ATTR_MODE64BIT | SGX_ATTR_KSS;
> > > +	encl->attributes_mask |= SGX_ATTR_DEBUG | SGX_ATTR_MODE64BIT | SGX_ATTR_KSS;
> > 
> > Alternatively, move the existing code to sgx_open()?  Initializing the field
> > when the encl object is allocated feels more correct.
> > 
> 
> 
> This seems like a good idea. Thanks for your suggestion. I have sent v2
> patch, include the next two patches.

Did you ask from Sean about suggested-by's? Now it looks like
that doing these patches were originally proposed by Sean.

/Jarkko