Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Thu, 21 Jan 2021 07:28:19 +0100
From:   Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
To:     Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>,
        Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/deadline: Reduce rq lock contention in
 dl_add_task_root_domain()
Message-ID: <20210121062819.GH10569@localhost.localdomain>
References: <20210119083542.19856-1-dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210119083542.19856-1-dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

On 19/01/21 09:35, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> dl_add_task_root_domain() is called during sched domain rebuild:
> 
>   rebuild_sched_domains_locked()
>     partition_and_rebuild_sched_domains()
>       rebuild_root_domains()
>          for all top_cpuset descendants:
>            update_tasks_root_domain()
>              for all tasks of cpuset:
>                dl_add_task_root_domain()
> 
> Change it so that only the task pi lock is taken to check if the task
> has a SCHED_DEADLINE (DL) policy. In case that p is a DL task take the
> rq lock as well to be able to safely de-reference root domain's DL
> bandwidth structure.
> 
> Most of the tasks will have another policy (namely SCHED_NORMAL) and
> can now bail without taking the rq lock.
> 
> One thing to note here: Even in case that there aren't any DL user
> tasks, a slow frequency switching system with cpufreq gov schedutil has
> a DL task (sugov) per frequency domain running which participates in DL
> bandwidth management.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>

Looks good to me, thanks!

Acked-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>

Best,
Juri