Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 5 Nov 2001 12:26:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 5 Nov 2001 12:25:53 -0500 Received: from colorfullife.com ([216.156.138.34]:13329 "EHLO colorfullife.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 5 Nov 2001 12:25:38 -0500 Message-ID: <3BE6CB90.D08FB64C@colorfullife.com> Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2001 18:25:36 +0100 From: Manfred Spraul X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.13-ac7 i686) X-Accept-Language: en, de MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Who sees "IRQ routing conflict" in dmesg? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Who has a line IRQ routing conflict for 01:23.4, have irq 5, want irq 6 in his dmesg dump? If you find that line, please send me the relevant lines from the dmesg dump, lspci -vx and cat /proc/interrupts. And obviously: does everything work. Thanks, Manfred Background: Linux always uses the interrupts choosen by the bios. The bios stores the irq number in PCI_INTERRUPT_LINE, and configures the irq router accordingly. If both do not match, then the above message is printed. Right now the kernel uses the value from PCI_INTERRUPT_LINE, and ignores the irq router. That doesn't work with some vaio's, but before submitting that change to Linus I want to verify that this won't break other setups. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/