Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932177AbWIOC6J (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Sep 2006 22:58:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751467AbWIOC6J (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Sep 2006 22:58:09 -0400 Received: from omx2-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.171.19]:63905 "EHLO omx2.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751463AbWIOC6I (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Sep 2006 22:58:08 -0400 Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 12:57:45 +1000 From: David Chinner To: Michal Piotrowski Cc: David Chinner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com, Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [xfs-masters] Re: 2.6.18-rc6-mm2 Message-ID: <20060915025745.GM3034@melbourne.sgi.com> References: <20060913015850.GB3034@melbourne.sgi.com> <20060913042627.GE3024@melbourne.sgi.com> <6bffcb0e0609130243y776492c7g78f4d3902dc3c72c@mail.gmail.com> <20060914035904.GF3034@melbourne.sgi.com> <450914C4.2080607@gmail.com> <6bffcb0e0609140150n7499bf54k86e2b7da47766005@mail.gmail.com> <20060914090808.GS3024@melbourne.sgi.com> <6bffcb0e0609140229r59691de5i58d2d81f839d744e@mail.gmail.com> <6bffcb0e0609140303n72a73867qb308f5068733161c@mail.gmail.com> <6bffcb0e0609141001ic137201p6a2413f5ca915234@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6bffcb0e0609141001ic137201p6a2413f5ca915234@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1142 Lines: 41 On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 07:01:38PM +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > >> > >> I'll build system with gcc 3.4 > > > >It's not a compiler issue. > > > >Binary search should solve this mystery. > > I was wrong - it's in vanilla tree > (http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/files/mm/2.6.18-rc6-mm2/mm-dmesg1). > > cat hunt | head -n 3 > origin.patch > BAD > libata-ignore-cfa-signature-while-sanity-checking-an-atapi-device.patch Not sure what this means.... > I can reproduce this bug with all CONFIG_DEBUG_*=y. > (only > CONFIG_DEBUG_SYNCHRO_TEST=m > CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST=m > as modules) I notice you're running i386 with 4k stacks - I wonder if you're blowing the stack by running xfs on loopback. I've been testing on x86_64 and ia64 which don't have those issues. Can you try with 8K stacks instead of 4k stacks? Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner Principal Engineer SGI Australian Software Group - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/