Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp502774pxb; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 12:17:30 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzcCAg84UKg0l5zEpkTrGFKCoaKCErCCpGF/J08EfaD4cKRsLC8afMq0NVtBIajCJaWLSfs X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:39d0:: with SMTP id i16mr807172eje.18.1611260250328; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 12:17:30 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1611260250; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=lk6rGRzZolhks1QiNNPBNFFVb5DQJwORDSi6WPP3LHP6LvnJ2zMA0ac4FUh0BI59MB U+9G62NGBEBQNUJL4emM0ADShHY47ihAQd0n3a7nYWlx3uJ0VTSEZw55s++8DpbC82GL 66TvSlpdNz/C43ZoeVXoiNQKQy/CW+N+y9qFUTjNlRJelWGImruZCaXiuVTiqss9XNw/ /Yqy7/LdijYg6luigVtwhVqSz1dTwe82fPImdug28iwFqJupIOY6OI0xjOzK6ZQtDm6K 5qAV9IBSPuT4gfLQ/AMt8djvUu6ISUW+DSEagdCs6LKCbbwGGef2QvRwR5hh3s0JSRUJ 4iLg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:subject:from :references:cc:to:reply-to; bh=dVsjvKaCVwralxI5zARSOQQIxlzovaj1ya8SYQBcCCE=; b=Mx3IK0tL4//ExLHU5L456eHqeEXewGhvIKjIjTDsMHsCzxzoD1PhDDleGGOf4Jk9e+ 746JNM20JQX1mvEsj6xLBnmna2Ry7tcTfacW1Ph+YSh+K0kuAh9m+ruz7RtoMW9R6UH5 yQL5NenxrZu5PjlU35/GvEeAQpfKn1zwerLz0LROelRMHit1RACT/xi3uwzAzs6dkMur bGPp5qHdM89IBgO9QV8uis9tsH8Uepp196WUFriNTDzG610V1B0/+NLPr1I4tPcMc+eK eYT+f53t7yz/rfPu/sIxzSGsx9Yhip+TPLyKndlWB92XHvf7myywRyyl87L3MrMOepxo aAfA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c2si2648513edw.234.2021.01.21.12.17.06; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 12:17:30 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726037AbhAUUQb (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 21 Jan 2021 15:16:31 -0500 Received: from mail-lf1-f47.google.com ([209.85.167.47]:47056 "EHLO mail-lf1-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726674AbhAUUQI (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jan 2021 15:16:08 -0500 Received: by mail-lf1-f47.google.com with SMTP id o10so4307671lfl.13; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 12:15:50 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:reply-to:to:cc:references:from:subject :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=dVsjvKaCVwralxI5zARSOQQIxlzovaj1ya8SYQBcCCE=; b=J6Wq1E/EcLyb7cZ7OVsTDBCxC4yMk1O2t7hb6NPvvMLv0rEHX2r9mIUbcsnBXDCL9d f/eZfX4M549U4clI9R2knH98WYbS29Zjj4VTgrstkxrhlDqMky1oL1wkL1U0td1wg2++ F846LZYZsCYeqI6KkjKnapTmZK1rrEPemy9HI6qYNsYLhXsISabAmuzkuJScCUb2wJer DwI6a+xSR5iwtj1DgmgjONoSbffTfxyXj5z9NrYe2fDo/dYFBbLEGAdY26jdNVBZckOa NPEaIuiK+/HFsbOJxDWpUV/PlzL+uIxEHI3rUiURjW5WSGeE+5U1jzyL/6fdVQQ+DkKd 3tgQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533WFLsRm+7EpHE0ELmCcvmnriZAqjIDN39k+pXJwc8PwzzXMGlp mjMcI2gWr/CQCJNtqAvg+Ec= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:20d2:: with SMTP id u18mr28647lfr.47.1611260124380; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 12:15:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.68.32.148] (broadband-188-32-236-56.ip.moscow.rt.ru. [188.32.236.56]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m12sm682023lji.110.2021.01.21.12.15.23 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 21 Jan 2021 12:15:23 -0800 (PST) Reply-To: efremov@linux.com To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Gaurav Kohli , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall References: <1601976833-24377-1-git-send-email-gkohli@codeaurora.org> <20210121140951.2a554a5e@gandalf.local.home> From: Denis Efremov Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] trace: Fix race in trace_open and buffer resize call Message-ID: <021b1b38-47ce-bc8b-3867-99160cc85523@linux.com> Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 23:15:22 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210121140951.2a554a5e@gandalf.local.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 1/21/21 10:09 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 17:30:40 +0300 > Denis Efremov wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> This patch (CVE-2020-27825) was tagged with >> Fixes: b23d7a5f4a07a ("ring-buffer: speed up buffer resets by avoiding synchronize_rcu for each CPU") >> >> I'm not an expert here but it seems like b23d7a5f4a07a only refactored >> ring_buffer_reset_cpu() by introducing reset_disabled_cpu_buffer() without >> significant changes. Hence, mutex_lock(&buffer->mutex)/mutex_unlock(&buffer->mutex) >> can be backported further than b23d7a5f4a07a~ and to all LTS kernels. Is >> b23d7a5f4a07a the actual cause of the bug? >> > > Ug, that looks to be a mistake. Looking back at the thread about this: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20200915141304.41fa7c30@gandalf.local.home/ I see from the link that it was planned to backport the patch to LTS kernels: > Actually we are seeing issue in older kernel like 4.19/4.14/5.4 and there below patch was not > present in stable branches: > Commit b23d7a5f4a07 ("ring-buffer: speed up buffer resets by avoiding synchronize_rcu for each CPU") The point is that it's not backported yet. Maybe because of Fixes tag. I've discovered this while trying to formalize CVE-2020-27825 bug in cvehound https://github.com/evdenis/cvehound/blob/master/cvehound/cve/CVE-2020-27825.cocci I think that the backport to the 4.4+ should be something like: diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c index 547a3a5ac57b..2171b377bbc1 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c +++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c @@ -4295,6 +4295,8 @@ void ring_buffer_reset_cpu(struct ring_buffer *buffer, int cpu) if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, buffer->cpumask)) return; + mutex_lock(&buffer->mutex); + atomic_inc(&buffer->resize_disabled); atomic_inc(&cpu_buffer->record_disabled); @@ -4317,6 +4319,8 @@ void ring_buffer_reset_cpu(struct ring_buffer *buffer, int cpu) atomic_dec(&cpu_buffer->record_disabled); atomic_dec(&buffer->resize_disabled); + + mutex_unlock(&buffer->mutex); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ring_buffer_reset_cpu); Thanks, Denis