Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Thu, 21 Jan 2021 13:22:42 +0530
From:   Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc:     Carl Huang <cjhuang@codeaurora.org>, hemantk@codeaurora.org,
        ath11k@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mhi: use irq_flags if controller driver configures it
Message-ID: <20210121075242.GB30041@thinkpad>
References: <20210104101128.8217-1-cjhuang@codeaurora.org>
 <20210104170359.GE2256@work>
 <87o8hti8t8.fsf@codeaurora.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87o8hti8t8.fsf@codeaurora.org>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 09:40:19AM +0200, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> writes:
> 
> > On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 06:11:28PM +0800, Carl Huang wrote:
> >> If controller driver has specified the irq_flags, mhi uses this specified
> >> irq_flags. Otherwise, mhi uses default irq_flags.
> >> 
> >> The purpose of this change is to support one MSI vector for QCA6390.
> >> MHI will use one same MSI vector too in this scenario.
> >> 
> >> In case of one MSI vector, IRQ_NO_BALANCING is needed when irq handler
> >> is requested. The reason is if irq migration happens, the msi_data may
> >> change too. However, the msi_data is already programmed to QCA6390
> >> hardware during initialization phase. This msi_data inconsistence will
> >> result in crash in kernel.
> >> 
> >> Another issue is in case of one MSI vector, IRQF_NO_SUSPEND will trigger
> >> WARNINGS because QCA6390 wants to disable the IRQ during the suspend.
> >> 
> >> To avoid above two issues, QCA6390 driver specifies the irq_flags in case
> >> of one MSI vector when mhi_register_controller is called.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Carl Huang <cjhuang@codeaurora.org>
> >> Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
> >
> > Applied to mhi-next!
> 
> Would it be possible again to have an immutable branch for this commit?
> We need it for implementing one MHI support to ath11k[1] required by
> Dell XPS 13 9310 laptops, which a lot of people are waiting. Otherwise I
> can only apply the feature for v5.13, which will be released on July.
> 

Dropped this patch from mhi-next and applied to mhi-ath11k-immutable branch:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mani/mhi.git/log/?h=mhi-ath11k-immutable

This branch will also be merged into mhi-next.

Thanks,
Mani