Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750777AbWIOJVr (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Sep 2006 05:21:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750797AbWIOJVq (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Sep 2006 05:21:46 -0400 Received: from mailhub.sw.ru ([195.214.233.200]:20578 "EHLO relay.sw.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750777AbWIOJVq (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Sep 2006 05:21:46 -0400 Message-ID: <450A71B1.8020009@sw.ru> Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 13:26:09 +0400 From: Kirill Korotaev User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20060417 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, ru MIME-Version: 1.0 To: sekharan@us.ibm.com CC: rohitseth@google.com, Rik van Riel , vatsa@in.ibm.com, CKRM-Tech , balbir@in.ibm.com, Dave Hansen , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Andi Kleen , Christoph Hellwig , Andrey Savochkin , devel@openvz.org, Matt Helsley , Hugh Dickins , Alexey Dobriyan , Oleg Nesterov , Alan Cox , Pavel Emelianov Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory) References: <44FD918A.7050501@sw.ru> <44FDAB81.5050608@in.ibm.com> <44FEC7E4.7030708@sw.ru> <44FF1EE4.3060005@in.ibm.com> <1157580371.31893.36.camel@linuxchandra> <45011CAC.2040502@openvz.org> <1157743424.19884.65.camel@linuxchandra> <1157751834.1214.112.camel@galaxy.corp.google.com> <1157999107.6029.7.camel@linuxchandra> <1158001831.12947.16.camel@galaxy.corp.google.com> <20060912104410.GA28444@in.ibm.com> <1158081752.20211.12.camel@galaxy.corp.google.com> <1158105732.4800.26.camel@linuxchandra> <1158108203.20211.52.camel@galaxy.corp.google.com> <1158109991.4800.43.camel@linuxchandra> <1158111218.20211.69.camel@galaxy.corp.google.com> <1158186247.18927.11.camel@linuxchandra> In-Reply-To: <1158186247.18927.11.camel@linuxchandra> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 886 Lines: 24 Chandra Seetharaman wrote: > esoteric ?! Please look at the different operating system that provide > resource management and other resource management capability providers. > All of them have both guarantees and limits (they might call them > differently). > > Here are a few: > http://www.hp.com/go/prm > http://www.sun.com/software/resourcemgr/ > http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/pdfs/sg245977.pdf > http://www.vmware.com/pdf/vmware_drs_wp.pdf > http://www.aurema.com have you ever tested any of these?! there is no _memory_ guarantees AFAIK in all of them except for VMware which can reserve required amount of RAM for VM. Kirill - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/