Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp829446pxb; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 23:33:04 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzVvSrJ+a2NZ6c+loEwfkNTm57em96kVNZ2sUpOlUqPFOFmA9uRxtTdlcfNfzd7Fvmwe7Q/ X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:d209:: with SMTP id w9mr2045992ejz.211.1611300784252; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 23:33:04 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1611300784; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Hrit+7ZlOrYGKlkhIWsFdImKCIIUa0RlQcr6F2UjTl727p+0RvmNGbQ1M2DV0BmFqN LIbl8P0CjIlnk7RKWVA7512bObyQO9r7D9q7+FQL3gHGf72EEtGN9pWDVthMPIrSUFRZ n8cCtBMKjo3LDOo9KR5c4TYKtkBLjCuRhxMl9dtusajEsbE2WcO4NPB8FEJS+tE0fFgH NQYsQpx0QXbDBsku2M4EnKd4Dt8FF7JH6vvC8zMc+caxVEK6wU74AfD9HBlyhdikP70q GO0+ts81JukMDwcL7WAEuK7mzvQJGP73+ESJxH93rV1EbUFxg7PXDrsSyzJ1qpPXFqvN g6NQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-language:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject; bh=oC6Ae/udphBO/Zrhb1SeoXJi7p63D3wgN6w3QUqc6fI=; b=0gjLfN2m4mbIqev4Kp6dkkoegM9M87eLzQqyaWUlpDrznp0WxZbINQZjj6nrz+UpNu ln6c/pryD9XnmsH/hrLoTuA29x3COMG+IsSokFzESQmdoF+M8RQxGTPG1FH5Uem/QnAr Z1lcUY2EVhA9Y+okPDPvneSvE4UiSNaoMCBno8y2cNDj0CVK9zkkIMacvS9tHXuD1oRN GBcN9SC5Uupt/fyg2d5HVWscz6ERtx0fYoa99KO4Ezjb8Kp9LqZ/ktsRWWCjXmGL7ry1 f/uwdPIO6OR/rFDTO82hM4QexIu7cbbsyDnChBHDYAnC2idb4GEuVy9Up/FEHbcgBtD7 0l6A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id dd20si3237472edb.489.2021.01.21.23.32.41; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 23:33:04 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727104AbhAVHa4 (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 22 Jan 2021 02:30:56 -0500 Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.190]:11177 "EHLO szxga04-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726124AbhAVHag (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jan 2021 02:30:36 -0500 Received: from DGGEMS410-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4DMW851ssTzl83B; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 15:28:21 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.174.177.244] (10.174.177.244) by DGGEMS410-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.210) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.498.0; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 15:29:44 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] initrd: Use unified initrd reserve function in ARM/RISCV To: Russell King - ARM Linux admin CC: , , , , Atish Patra , Palmer Dabbelt , , Paul Walmsley References: <20210115054606.124502-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> <48c006a8-a352-488c-4981-768faffbe343@huawei.com> <20210117100903.GB1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <20210118091733.GD1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> From: Kefeng Wang Message-ID: Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 15:29:43 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210118091733.GD1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-Originating-IP: [10.174.177.244] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2021/1/18 17:17, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote: > On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 09:01:40AM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote: >> On 2021/1/17 18:09, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote: >>> On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 12:57:55PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote: >>>> Correct Russell's mail address (from linux@armlinux.org.uk to >>>> rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk, should update the MAINTAINERS) >>> No. MAINTAINERS is correct. >> I got following message,  so I check mail of your recent patches, and send a >> new one. >> >> Please ignore it, there may be some other problems. >> >> "*Delivery has failed to these recipients or groups:* >> >> linux@armlinux.org.uk >> A communication failure occurred during the delivery of this message. Please >> to resend the message later. If the problem continues, contact your >> helpdesk." > That is a most unhelpful bounce message - I suppose it's designed for > non-technical people to ensure that the problem can't be resolved. > > >From what I can see from my end, every attempt involving your email > address last week (wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com) has been successful, so > I suspect the problem is not at my end. ok,thank you for letting me know that the email has been received, any comment about the ARM part in the patchset  ;) > > In any case, all @armlinux.org.uk addresses hit the same server, so > if there's a "communication failure" for the domain, it would affect > all local-parts equally. >