Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751491AbWIOOOO (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Sep 2006 10:14:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751498AbWIOOON (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Sep 2006 10:14:13 -0400 Received: from omx2-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.171.19]:25984 "EHLO omx2.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751491AbWIOOOM (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Sep 2006 10:14:12 -0400 Message-ID: <450AB506.30802@sgi.com> Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 16:13:26 +0200 From: Jes Sorensen User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060527) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: karim@opersys.com Cc: Paul Mundt , Roman Zippel , Ingo Molnar , Mathieu Desnoyers , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , Ingo Molnar , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Thomas Gleixner , Tom Zanussi , ltt-dev@shafik.org, Michel Dagenais Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108 References: <20060914135548.GA24393@elte.hu> <20060914171320.GB1105@elte.hu> <20060914181557.GA22469@elte.hu> <4509A54C.1050905@opersys.com> <450A9EC9.9080307@opersys.com> <20060915132052.GA7843@localhost.usen.ad.jp> <20060915135709.GB8723@localhost.usen.ad.jp> <450AB5F9.8040501@opersys.com> In-Reply-To: <450AB5F9.8040501@opersys.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1240 Lines: 28 Karim Yaghmour wrote: > Paul Mundt wrote: >> subjective, LTT proved that this was a problem regarding general >> code-level intrusiveness when the number of tracepoints in relatively >> close locality started piling up based on what people considered >> arbitrarily useful, and LTTng doesn't appear to do anything to address >> this. > > "LTT proved that ..." what are you talking about? Have you noticed > the posting earlier regarding the fact that the ltt tracepoints did > not change over a 5 year span? **five** years ... Where do you get > this claim that ltt trace points "started piling up"? Have a look > at figure 2 of this article and let me know exactly which of those > tracepoints are actually a problem to you: Because other people have tried to use LTT for additional projects, but said projects haven't been integrated into LTT. In other words, just because *you* haven't added those, doesn't mean someone else won't try and do it later, if LTT was integrated. Nice try! Jes - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/