Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751502AbWIOOSK (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Sep 2006 10:18:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751505AbWIOOSJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Sep 2006 10:18:09 -0400 Received: from outpipe-village-512-1.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:45746 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751502AbWIOOSG (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Sep 2006 10:18:06 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108 From: Alan Cox To: Roman Zippel Cc: Tim Bird , Ingo Molnar , Mathieu Desnoyers , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , Ingo Molnar , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Thomas Gleixner , Tom Zanussi , ltt-dev@shafik.org, Michel Dagenais In-Reply-To: References: <20060914033826.GA2194@Krystal> <20060914112718.GA7065@elte.hu> <20060914135548.GA24393@elte.hu> <20060914171320.GB1105@elte.hu> <20060914181557.GA22469@elte.hu> <4509B03A.3070504@am.sony.com> <1158320406.29932.16.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1158323938.29932.23.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1158327696.29932.29.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 15:41:17 +0100 Message-Id: <1158331277.29932.66.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.2 (2.6.2-1.fc5.5) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 977 Lines: 23 Ar Gwe, 2006-09-15 am 15:34 +0200, ysgrifennodd Roman Zippel: > > Maintainability ? common good over individual weirdnesses ? Ability for > > people to concentrate on getting one good set of interfaces not twelve > > bad ones ? Consistency for user space ? > > Alan, you're making things up without any proof. Welcome to my killfile. There isn't much point having a discussion with anyone who considers any view or fact not in agreement as "no proof" and any view or fact that favours them as "proven". In the meantime perhaps the saner members of the static trace brigade can explain why gcc debug data isn't good enough for them when its good enough for kgdb to do single stepping at source level and variable printing ? Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/