Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 22 Jan 2021 11:59:09 +0100 (CET)
From:   Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>
To:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com>,
        Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] Documentation: livepatch: Document reliable
 stacktrace and minor cleanup
In-Reply-To: <20210121115226.565790ef@lwn.net>
Message-ID: <nycvar.YFH.7.76.2101221158450.5622@cbobk.fhfr.pm>
References: <20210120164714.16581-1-broonie@kernel.org> <20210121115226.565790ef@lwn.net>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (LSU 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 21 Jan 2021, Jonathan Corbet wrote:

> > This series adds a document, mainly written by Mark Rutland, which 
> > makes explicit the requirements for implementing reliable stacktrace 
> > in order to aid architectures adding this feature.  It also updates 
> > the other livepatching documents to use automatically generated tables 
> > of contents following review comments on Mark's document.
> 
> So...is this deemed ready and, if so, do you want it to go through the
> docs tree or via some other path?

I am planning to take it through livepatching tree unless there are any 
additional last-minutes comments.

Thanks,

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs