Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
IronPort-SDR: PGarIi6QTG+I9LIhdvquCOGfspA7sPtUx5742TLHSw1axWQdKUAD9BtXK8cFbV0FxBkNLlmAyR
 ptd2SH4h1l/FrlGrSlrxAYP0HqkQ1JZn0+BHBnl0smH6oOUM6ebMyiLyQBnHXXhlx8ifA2oOUj
 GGN5IrRM3GCtD0jLYS5CQicGmwP0iCRG0ySdulAo5VFOC7LUEGIPw0hsNlNHwxy60QjQwUVWpB
 3qV93A7Y6FpalYIjFY7VUzHVfKU6W6lZhe+qVdLdLl7z+nrXGrBEMnj+M3EtFs7/vX76QjEGd7
 ogI=
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: at91: soc for 5.12
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
CC:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
        arm-soc <arm@kernel.org>, SoC Team <soc@kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
        Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@microchip.com>
References: <20210122143536.168833-1-nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>
 <CAK8P3a0s5UPvCzQrcYmPPDYgT+YyZ3vc=fF0GEwpqROR+Zio-g@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>
Organization: microchip
Message-ID: <715938cd-d898-5d12-cc11-d79cf27c5430@microchip.com>
Date:   Fri, 22 Jan 2021 17:14:32 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a0s5UPvCzQrcYmPPDYgT+YyZ3vc=fF0GEwpqROR+Zio-g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 22/01/2021 at 16:25, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 3:35 PM <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com> wrote:
>>
>> From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>
>>
>> Arnd, Olof,
>>
>> I'm taking back the lead on sending the pull-requests for AT91 and hope that I
>> didn't loose the knowledge in the meantime. Tell me if there's something I'm
>> missing. Thanks a lot to Alexandre who kept our flow steady and very
>> predictable during all those years!
>>
>> Here are the first SoC changes for 5.12 which contain a single patch for multi
>> platform kernels.
>>
>> I plan to send another pull-request for the SoC changes related to new sama7g5
>> that Claudiu sent to the mainling-list recently. I'll let it mature in
>> linux-next by the beginning of next week and will send another pull-request by
>> mid-next-week.
>> Tell me if you see a problem with this approach.
> 
> This all looks good to me, but I think I'd rather take the 'soc' pull request
> into the v5.11 bugfixes, as this may already affect users on other machines.
> 
> I would also suggest adding a 'Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org' tag. If you like,
> I can just cherry-pick that patch into the fixes branch and add it there.

Oh yes, that'd be good, indeed.

You can add the following tag:
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org #4.12+

Best regards,
-- 
Nicolas Ferre