Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp1292928pxb; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 11:44:08 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzuceUNgYHKFoBKWef5FitlW/HO+bWlA5kN8sjZ5CojG1andWC7UCgfyEfKpJ6DgGnQCD0r X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:941a:: with SMTP id q26mr4174592ejx.266.1611344648691; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 11:44:08 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1611344648; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=KCIIaUsTX43R0eYldZXswj5YgsOMtM+6F+JzDjO7G+CbPRPHnOe7dFIoM5VkqtCVTe dYngr2t/9UJgt95TiXJDDN5pQ6hgNu4iFCDOEge5N/BMbRnXr2Lysnf4PgllX37qTGm6 GbR1oIp6hWAGcefkZbJoXC2MiQsMasfBjqZYwb+p77M/KbWLaqElecCiW5rM9rYPrb5n SVlTf6sFocmxt+h1ZkL7A1oYTSnKLNQrK0EKDHBvqX9uqrbXkip+0BUCNaUX1cZgrmyY fSoY8N/Wv3hn+55SH1pie+bfCF1H7RC6GTfA0Tku/GnVW9l3CP47FjVMhO5QpDuiqAB1 m7jA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=qaA8gn8W+Qu4RF9KetEmDBu/lptRV9ahKpJnZpI7ZCo=; b=ALmoR1jX6vQYB4aOh0tYlC5tPomOuXEnzG/8mStq89jYXmy4ov2GXplhhvzdYvDK/t 3deqGkz9h5zTvoohcvNH4GxEDtB0RJQbKA57Z6wj6HbP+ewf01f927S2ux1/P9Z9hP0J PhFV8dDYgJGkjOSMFQtru2cdBNDEyP9eEIslqy3IJjow5Ph6ovkcwhvv0gUQSrjrD0R2 fuTfCSaZewjPUGeAiIqsmQiHUMGVHntcQAdq5Cjw75+lhYDjv4jXoJQZG+B8LIF4xYqb Bafs3hJqM1bmd9KFWUC7YF+rBNXuy2ShwKEJRSsb85zaqvpgYUUEK6r2bc3FKPaQys8G nBYw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Q9HhAWjk; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q10si3979579edn.332.2021.01.22.11.43.44; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 11:44:08 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Q9HhAWjk; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730054AbhAVTmZ (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 22 Jan 2021 14:42:25 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49206 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728425AbhAVSh7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jan 2021 13:37:59 -0500 Received: from mail-pj1-x1036.google.com (mail-pj1-x1036.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1036]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA112C061788; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 10:37:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pj1-x1036.google.com with SMTP id u4so4448365pjn.4; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 10:37:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=qaA8gn8W+Qu4RF9KetEmDBu/lptRV9ahKpJnZpI7ZCo=; b=Q9HhAWjka/fgAdf6tIezBrvuW0cqacMGrv5pjCFzngBW44GQxtCcNZSPne3ymkCfhg YYBo+8Ei8TAYYjJ5Eu0diMLL+MuMDVtQA+Lb6IpKqVcDzM+zoAWjORzSs53tAddbxY2v m6GqvrK8kuPKSk6uttoSnbJ7XUr5BYvXs+mDNZWqR0ov5GMYmL9yCbH8WNg43XU8/DkA j9RdPlvHhj/EhnQqqTlwDoKourDCNC87oFvQblXxjzZ5zZsHQ5Il3ec9mwQAtteMk3pq Uuxe9dHerS5Ii5o55wbA5hmc1BRFS7V4SqI10Vh0b5x+3zqzhLr5459nwZct7Yl98Ynt 9wgQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=qaA8gn8W+Qu4RF9KetEmDBu/lptRV9ahKpJnZpI7ZCo=; b=LEOzMtiS1DypVUxJS0fDijXKW6aBlyZmjn9rmMjhFAQsy61pkPFR2IXK2lMbCT16Ue 8KwOZ8ZwvgN7XiP+bSXKtlY8dqYb+5bMH8Uxm+9KL8iWEzSzyGBh10r1EwKahQMjB9Jr ArI1VrsAQJGg7fk+9oDyD17v73Gg673CpeIsNWQ6egC6cbZuVg2wLO3bJ31QhHpDI27T ehYyeRrwsAvIkv5/xw1Wtjz3UnqxEns4xQnAzPY+E+nFECB0yHvjz5GxXTZ6dzssSRqZ Hw5yLWjra3rW5d9IOVi8lGLAK4nPUPPQknMrmbbfiyGS+PTTBvtff1iZEs3jEv6teWTj S9Zw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533P6V/PvQt3qPtPn+RbRKOdfatEkEkEhj3YXjIf0bke79V/2/iy ud2tBwxYvoAQD2PQPDoP0NJax0DIrSKJVGs1NwrGeMrMgyG3UQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7c04:b029:dc:99f2:eea4 with SMTP id x4-20020a1709027c04b02900dc99f2eea4mr5931479pll.43.1611340638255; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 10:37:18 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1611329955.4913929-2-xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com> <20210122172534.9896-1-alobakin@pm.me> In-Reply-To: <20210122172534.9896-1-alobakin@pm.me> From: Magnus Karlsson Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 19:37:06 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 3/3] xsk: build skb by page To: Alexander Lobakin Cc: Xuan Zhuo , Eric Dumazet , "Michael S . Tsirkin" , Jason Wang , "David S . Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Bjorn Topel , Magnus Karlsson , Jonathan Lemon , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Jesper Dangaard Brouer , John Fastabend , Andrii Nakryiko , Martin KaFai Lau , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , KP Singh , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, bpf , Network Development , open list Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 6:26 PM Alexander Lobakin wrote: > > From: Xuan Zhuo > Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 23:39:15 +0800 > > > On Fri, 22 Jan 2021 13:55:14 +0100, Magnus Karlsson wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 1:39 PM Alexander Lobakin wrote: > > > > > > > > From: Magnus Karlsson > > > > Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 13:18:47 +0100 > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 12:57 PM Alexander Lobakin wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Alexander Lobakin > > > > > > Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 11:47:45 +0000 > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Eric Dumazet > > > > > > > Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 16:41:33 +0100 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 1/21/21 2:47 PM, Xuan Zhuo wrote: > > > > > > > > > This patch is used to construct skb based on page to save memory copy > > > > > > > > > overhead. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This function is implemented based on IFF_TX_SKB_NO_LINEAR. Only the > > > > > > > > > network card priv_flags supports IFF_TX_SKB_NO_LINEAR will use page to > > > > > > > > > directly construct skb. If this feature is not supported, it is still > > > > > > > > > necessary to copy data to construct skb. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ---------------- Performance Testing ------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The test environment is Aliyun ECS server. > > > > > > > > > Test cmd: > > > > > > > > > ``` > > > > > > > > > xdpsock -i eth0 -t -S -s > > > > > > > > > ``` > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Test result data: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > size 64 512 1024 1500 > > > > > > > > > copy 1916747 1775988 1600203 1440054 > > > > > > > > > page 1974058 1953655 1945463 1904478 > > > > > > > > > percent 3.0% 10.0% 21.58% 32.3% > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo > > > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Dust Li > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > > net/xdp/xsk.c | 104 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- > > > > > > > > > 1 file changed, 86 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/net/xdp/xsk.c b/net/xdp/xsk.c > > > > > > > > > index 4a83117..38af7f1 100644 > > > > > > > > > --- a/net/xdp/xsk.c > > > > > > > > > +++ b/net/xdp/xsk.c > > > > > > > > > @@ -430,6 +430,87 @@ static void xsk_destruct_skb(struct sk_buff *skb) > > > > > > > > > sock_wfree(skb); > > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +static struct sk_buff *xsk_build_skb_zerocopy(struct xdp_sock *xs, > > > > > > > > > + struct xdp_desc *desc) > > > > > > > > > +{ > > > > > > > > > + u32 len, offset, copy, copied; > > > > > > > > > + struct sk_buff *skb; > > > > > > > > > + struct page *page; > > > > > > > > > + void *buffer; > > > > > > > > > + int err, i; > > > > > > > > > + u64 addr; > > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > > + skb = sock_alloc_send_skb(&xs->sk, 0, 1, &err); > > > > > > > > > + if (unlikely(!skb)) > > > > > > > > > + return ERR_PTR(err); > > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > > + addr = desc->addr; > > > > > > > > > + len = desc->len; > > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > > + buffer = xsk_buff_raw_get_data(xs->pool, addr); > > > > > > > > > + offset = offset_in_page(buffer); > > > > > > > > > + addr = buffer - xs->pool->addrs; > > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > > + for (copied = 0, i = 0; copied < len; i++) { > > > > > > > > > + page = xs->pool->umem->pgs[addr >> PAGE_SHIFT]; > > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > > + get_page(page); > > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > > + copy = min_t(u32, PAGE_SIZE - offset, len - copied); > > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > > + skb_fill_page_desc(skb, i, page, offset, copy); > > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > > + copied += copy; > > > > > > > > > + addr += copy; > > > > > > > > > + offset = 0; > > > > > > > > > + } > > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > > + skb->len += len; > > > > > > > > > + skb->data_len += len; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + skb->truesize += len; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is not the truesize, unfortunately. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We need to account for the number of pages, not number of bytes. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The easiest solution is: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > skb->truesize += PAGE_SIZE * i; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i would be equal to skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags after exiting the loop. > > > > > > > > > > > > Oops, pls ignore this. I forgot that XSK buffers are not > > > > > > "one per page". > > > > > > We need to count the number of pages manually and then do > > > > > > > > > > > > skb->truesize += PAGE_SIZE * npages; > > > > > > > > > > > > Right. > > > > > > > > > > There are two possible packet buffer (chunks) sizes in a umem, 2K and > > > > > 4K on a system with a PAGE_SIZE of 4K. If I remember correctly, and > > > > > please correct me if wrong, truesize is used for memory accounting. > > > > > But in this code, no kernel memory has been allocated (apart from the > > > > > skb). The page is just a part of the umem that has been already > > > > > allocated beforehand and by user-space in this case. So what should > > > > > truesize be in this case? Do we add 0, chunk_size * i, or the > > > > > complicated case of counting exactly how many 4K pages that are used > > > > > when the chunk_size is 2K, as two chunks could occupy the same page, > > > > > or just the upper bound of PAGE_SIZE * i that is likely a good > > > > > approximation in most cases? Just note that there might be other uses > > > > > of truesize that I am unaware of that could impact this choice. > > > > > > > > Truesize is "what amount of memory does this skb occupy with all its > > > > fragments, linear space and struct sk_buff itself". The closest it > > > > will be to the actual value, the better. > > > > In this case, I think adding of chunk_size * i would be enough. > > > > > > Sounds like a good approximation to me. > > > > > > > (PAGE_SIZE * i can be overwhelming when chunk_size is 2K, especially > > > > for setups with PAGE_SIZE > SZ_4K) > > > > > > You are right. That would be quite horrible on a system with a page size of 64K. > > > > Thank you everyone, I learned it. > > > > I also think it is appropriate to add a chunk size here, and there is actually > > only one chunk here, so it's very simple > > > > skb->truesize += xs->pool->chunk_size; > > umem chunks can't cross page boundaries. So if you're sure that > there could be only one chunk, you don't need the loop at all, > if I'm not missing anything. In the default mode, this is true. But in the unaligned_chunk mode that can be set on the umem, the chunk may cross one page boundary, so we need the loop and the chunk_size * i in the assignment of truesize. So "i" can be 1 or 2, but nothing else. > > In addition, I actually borrowed from the tcp code: > > > > tcp_build_frag: > > -------------- > > > > if (can_coalesce) { > > skb_frag_size_add(&skb_shinfo(skb)->frags[i - 1], copy); > > } else { > > get_page(page); > > skb_fill_page_desc(skb, i, page, offset, copy); > > } > > > > if (!(flags & MSG_NO_SHARED_FRAGS)) > > skb_shinfo(skb)->flags |= SKBFL_SHARED_FRAG; > > > > skb->len += copy; > > skb->data_len += copy; > > skb->truesize += copy; > > > > So, here is one bug? > > skb_frag_t is an alias to struct bvec. It doesn't contain info about > real memory consumption, so there's no other option buf just to add > "copy" to truesize. > XSK is different in this term, as it operates with chunks of a known > size. > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > > + refcount_add(len, &xs->sk.sk_wmem_alloc); > > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > > + return skb; > > > > > > > > > +} > > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Al > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Al > > > > > > > > Al >