Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp1503984pxb; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 18:49:02 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzrVJlmJDTMSOZ843ua2BOa85dAHrfw+Pc3PIMqAz6dfV7dwdb3CITW0KwQ7ZuscLGuXUfh X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:d295:: with SMTP id ay21mr4937547ejb.400.1611370142070; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 18:49:02 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1611370142; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ftZ5LH80chz3rFp1Xa5Ig+xrSAuh6vCmzcQruRp4AQfOfwfbqwmH7PA5NrB+bbsgAs vpINGLhXJcrQyyYXCRhEi6RuOMUB9BM+xKZSmA0We/a47rQsFW1kIBqPcxxNvMFOGZOu k8sZZm+Yc5hxweWGrLuhPGtfeVTijKH8D6wxwgJYIQcNUXGQHoygIUV642Y+98vlUr33 RR9i3DBXj3siio4klEQgrkLMAwRDnHsbEClDzgL62cBtbp+6Agt3LzmBAhnpfM4gyuVV 1la6ZA2+mH3byD0gm4s1EeAVkwCpKHgWkJT6IPb5UmF3X+S3Sa1C10Rb71SC6d/ygTMc Thdw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=ac67bof6xx2niPfUiSINB6obuW30Yl6gKBcDMoWsLps=; b=qr6criFsvjDGSdplRmDzT1RK9lUVQNItvNYQBubIBmH2F3EQq6gNlSHk4UL/+VakQM BTrPdC03QBTgoi5DFga+oAdHyRPTmHE5fFbtqE5bk2n9V/qlCD+ftK9MjwgpT+FQYm3+ WmfFr0InkN3m5A1ypCOXIEL4otCXMXlSg1hwNCQy0XoHRxA72xg9DLyCACBUHh7BfbkN AB7ZQ9Enh+/nRLYupq38xHMOQAIxTb5NC+LAbNsBgxLS4LrKBmuQeZgfUMdNljQDEpgQ W86T9KHdSrE2eiUHsMLrybQKZYM7sN//OMiLxr+QKsfO8mM+fyMNJFIcNu/V8wHS6bzM 5zfQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b="TWN6/5tu"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ce15si3640588ejb.507.2021.01.22.18.48.38; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 18:49:02 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b="TWN6/5tu"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726563AbhAWCqU (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 22 Jan 2021 21:46:20 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41552 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726013AbhAWCqS (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jan 2021 21:46:18 -0500 Received: from mail-oo1-xc34.google.com (mail-oo1-xc34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::c34]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3800FC06174A; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 18:45:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-oo1-xc34.google.com with SMTP id y72so1381447ooa.5; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 18:45:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=ac67bof6xx2niPfUiSINB6obuW30Yl6gKBcDMoWsLps=; b=TWN6/5tuWN09KxgXYis9xL/sf/taqvDK0zdsYvN+n1dExITRtPFMkOIm3wSZAY8TWm Y5xa2UWBCL6g504k79tvABTp8lmJDBqAMf5UfNJSvVJwN2QvrvDrXKcpcDCY2zmdT8Bd iyPk9Xk1E95TdaLSUH7yS1ffetKZ03d0BVZ0TP/TdrxoLBRWDNP7UvNFjXeMQiMGHNFZ 1naUo7A0Xkr4d487BrJ4MlbL5gJngwW5AMu+pUkqSzpn4Vr9Q8O6bP3sm/4ID+8pyimO R2rABPoAxRAjVX+xAAKaqRyWNTLRtgKjCBB76QtZwaEtWZTQW/CogItTLQz7D+SJ4DIz A6lA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=ac67bof6xx2niPfUiSINB6obuW30Yl6gKBcDMoWsLps=; b=EyizBKiENBDc5nJrapPkHceGXn83b6JVDrToEXMiGedEC96pdnjGSJ2xbOkaGYno7/ NcqYNjaHDLcBs1osLu0BVDsIfYC+diGOjNexcE8Ce7AbicWnOT4oVuotlCqW43YBMjIq 4Bbt9w5OtvXUXBCNpkAwYOgT5Dp6Lc38mZK2OYNoTnWHRVtg46Av9p177bmblrAohS0t cjByGRpr7ReHCeuMNuKtG3SCDpuxO8ol9NG9F2rmYBwRyMDdrs+ROct+IdrafxLFP4tD YuSY4UsQ6QXIFEJBKP5+tLTZrMcXSvKC9QkB6OlWl0cVgh5b5UVLZn3APzPGD8wCo9hs 5rYw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531fpAan+3GpevpseVT6xxNu968VtlwFuqq+QruqQJ2Wkj+xcb4W VPy+6yjHUt4DT6sTiziiZDVAYBpoBOw= X-Received: by 2002:a4a:e9f2:: with SMTP id w18mr5917373ooc.88.1611369937632; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 18:45:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (99-6-134-177.lightspeed.snmtca.sbcglobal.net. [99.6.134.177]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h203sm2109175oib.11.2021.01.22.18.45.36 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 22 Jan 2021 18:45:37 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 18:45:34 -0800 From: Enke Chen To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: Eric Dumazet , "David S. Miller" , Alexey Kuznetsov , Hideaki YOSHIFUJI , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Neal Cardwell , enkechen2020@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net] tcp: make TCP_USER_TIMEOUT accurate for zero window probes Message-ID: <20210123024534.GB100578@localhost.localdomain> References: <20210122191306.GA99540@localhost.localdomain> <20210122174325.269ac329@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> <20210123022823.GA100578@localhost.localdomain> <20210122183424.59c716a1@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210122183424.59c716a1@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, Jakub: On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 06:34:24PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Fri, 22 Jan 2021 18:28:23 -0800 Enke Chen wrote: > > Hi, Jakub: > > > > In terms of backporting, this patch should go together with: > > > > 9d9b1ee0b2d1 tcp: fix TCP_USER_TIMEOUT with zero window > > As in it: > > Fixes: 9d9b1ee0b2d1 tcp: fix TCP_USER_TIMEOUT with zero window > > or does it further fix the same issue, so: > > Fixes: 9721e709fa68 ("tcp: simplify window probe aborting on USER_TIMEOUT") > > ? Let me clarify: 1) 9d9b1ee0b2d1 tcp: fix TCP_USER_TIMEOUT with zero window fixes the bug and makes it work. 2) The current patch makes the TCP_USER_TIMEOUT accurate for 0-window probes. It's independent. With 1) and 2), the known issues with TCP_USER_TIMEOUT for 0-window probes would be resolved. Thanks. -- Enke