Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932271AbWIOVRE (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Sep 2006 17:17:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932273AbWIOVRE (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Sep 2006 17:17:04 -0400 Received: from www.osadl.org ([213.239.205.134]:23014 "EHLO mail.tglx.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932271AbWIOVRB (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Sep 2006 17:17:01 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108 From: Thomas Gleixner Reply-To: tglx@linutronix.de To: karim@opersys.com Cc: Andrew Morton , Paul Mundt , Jes Sorensen , Roman Zippel , Ingo Molnar , Mathieu Desnoyers , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Ingo Molnar , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Tom Zanussi , ltt-dev@shafik.org, Michel Dagenais In-Reply-To: <450B15B0.3060200@opersys.com> References: <20060914181557.GA22469@elte.hu> <4509A54C.1050905@opersys.com> <450A9EC9.9080307@opersys.com> <20060915132052.GA7843@localhost.usen.ad.jp> <20060915135709.GB8723@localhost.usen.ad.jp> <450AB5F9.8040501@opersys.com> <450AB506.30802@sgi.com> <450AB957.2050206@opersys.com> <20060915142836.GA9288@localhost.usen.ad.jp> <450ABE08.2060107@opersys.com> <1158332447.5724.423.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20060915111644.c857b2cf.akpm@osdl.org> <1158348954.5724.481.camel@localhost.localdomain> <450B0585.5070700@opersys.com> <1158351780.5724.507.camel@localhost.localdomain> <450B15B0.3060200@opersys.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 23:17:50 +0200 Message-Id: <1158355070.5724.524.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1736 Lines: 46 On Fri, 2006-09-15 at 17:05 -0400, Karim Yaghmour wrote: > Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > Stop whining! > > I resent that. See last sentence of this mail. > If your efforts in working on popular kernel topics > met rapid reward then I'm happy for you. The fact that others tackle > unpopular topics and persist despite constant personal attacks should > nevertheless be recognized for what it is. Oh well. I'm working on unpopular and intrusive stuff as long as you do. Just our ways to work and communicate differ slightly. > > mainline acceptable way. If you really believe that Kprobes / Systemtap > > is just a $corporate maliciousness to kick you out of business, then I > > really start to doubt your sanity. > > If that's how it was read, then it wasn't written right Ouch. Can you please tell me what's the technical merit of this paragraph: " ... The only reasons there are separate project teams is because managers in key positions made the decision that they'd rather break from existing projects which had had little success mainlining and instead use their corporate bodyweight to pressure/seduce kernel developers working for them into pushing their new great which-aboslutely- has-nothing-to-do-with-this-ltt-crap-(no,no, we actually agree with you kernel developers that this is crap, this is why we're developing this new amazing thing). That's the truth plain and simple." Sorry, I have not found a way to interpret it usefully. tglx - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/