Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932276AbWIOVYb (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Sep 2006 17:24:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932277AbWIOVYb (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Sep 2006 17:24:31 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:14991 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932276AbWIOVYa (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Sep 2006 17:24:30 -0400 Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 23:15:50 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Karim Yaghmour Cc: Roman Zippel , Thomas Gleixner , Andrew Morton , Paul Mundt , Jes Sorensen , Mathieu Desnoyers , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Ingo Molnar , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Tom Zanussi , ltt-dev@shafik.org, Michel Dagenais Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108 Message-ID: <20060915211550.GB11291@elte.hu> References: <20060915142836.GA9288@localhost.usen.ad.jp> <450ABE08.2060107@opersys.com> <1158332447.5724.423.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20060915111644.c857b2cf.akpm@osdl.org> <1158348954.5724.481.camel@localhost.localdomain> <450B0585.5070700@opersys.com> <1158351780.5724.507.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20060915204812.GA6909@elte.hu> <450B1864.5060401@opersys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <450B1864.5060401@opersys.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.9 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.9 required=5.9 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_50 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.0.3 -3.3 ALL_TRUSTED Did not pass through any untrusted hosts 0.5 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.4990] -0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 908 Lines: 23 * Karim Yaghmour wrote: > [...] Consider, though, that I'm factually explaining the real-life > result of resistance to static instrumentation. [...] with all due respect, do you realize the possibility that this resistance might be a genuine technical opinion on my part that is driven by the quality of the code being offered and by the conceptual problems static tracing introduces in the future, as i see them? And thus, maybe, what you wrote: " and instead use their corporate bodyweight to pressure/seduce kernel developers working for them into pushing their new great [...] " could possibly be total, utter nonsense? Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/