Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp2344186pxb; Sun, 24 Jan 2021 04:01:00 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzxB10UiDPqBcm0NQKqUyA6liNNYJpXj3nOZB7LUOaQ/rjiJKJPlX4TTObCoC+IVU3VhaPt X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1c0b:: with SMTP id ck11mr34979edb.35.1611489660120; Sun, 24 Jan 2021 04:01:00 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1611489660; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=lnbxzwTAwkcRME9XR4vCvsOROOFtrphhSwHR+KJw8uBBTGfAovZzBpOJTcifMErTKd 5YMBY06gOxLQtGrRTDUYeKQOn6DMz7rFfdkbAcoNYmaJP/7g5r8D/LRre/eKSewIiY5R F9lOATyRi96d1mWVJ5leudVPtC3jg4xQWcP0k4aTjJJTSw2kmpw6cwnniuofed+X2C6g m08sb0h3Dx+Msp49lhUr2GVEFqnC/HaiPS0sq1kgJnG2H7s0PaSyBkWLWYSx6la5i6zg UxWLzQn+DNz45gnr/ern8erPqqDjlanlP3GEV/1oMAwwv8ZKF15opHGrRwl0sFkK438P UQ3w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=k5tPHc1g092g1t4dS75d+N2TYC8pEDUg59CWfuIH+Sc=; b=cN763rGUVtUKapDNNIZaqOILi7xp/dZoF2K6GZFBJFt9/qZZ1QjKfl6gwXC3SR418v QrlsLHmnjcbGfaSW7RSQ4pUiLv1iNNTNRuI47u7pEx1ONGQqYHKDcvz7jIZ0dwrdnbV0 +4ETEb47H39ZG+yB+L8KWc62j8Qax5lIxu7wY1u3v4h8TasD4R6xlSQeQcKaujroSF/Q HGyxX7H41Ucyvddw71eXQA5TWQOtTDl9w9d89bPR6fSs4zjOcoq9vDg6r8wrTQcyPTSL d3tUpX5SF/UyFlS7lZl4CiAvcVo8u7Jzi5pL1IECBoXvFwfUnLE+RYt8HNSZua54ing4 a1sw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=LVAevWYv; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j12si4918905ejt.34.2021.01.24.04.00.32; Sun, 24 Jan 2021 04:01:00 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=LVAevWYv; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726811AbhAXL7c (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 24 Jan 2021 06:59:32 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:59142 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726806AbhAXL5S (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Jan 2021 06:57:18 -0500 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 96B5E22C9D; Sun, 24 Jan 2021 11:56:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1611489397; bh=kuc0ga0EMCsk0uQBO3oWOefHYQSTrNoAokvBZacsueQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=LVAevWYvvOlnI5vgZ6fBr0dCE5INW3EeFyp7Bx6ze05EqyFUB87yEDt3ZoB+S2aaf 696mJTZLPzBlOxN7YZewtkac5OKL/b/w+kIGP9dfQCLSUSiQDguIU1265iOJwXgVQ3 TbK+mcF+5zGKrpR2WmX7c+vn4Fpuy9Lihe9PlVlw= Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2021 12:56:34 +0100 From: Greg KH To: "Thokala, Srikanth" Cc: "mgross@linux.intel.com" , "markgross@kernel.org" , "arnd@arndb.de" , "bp@suse.de" , "damien.lemoal@wdc.com" , "dragan.cvetic@xilinx.com" , "corbet@lwn.net" , "leonard.crestez@nxp.com" , "palmerdabbelt@google.com" , "paul.walmsley@sifive.com" , "peng.fan@nxp.com" , "robh+dt@kernel.org" , "shawnguo@kernel.org" , "jassisinghbrar@gmail.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Derek Kiernan Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/34] misc: xlink-pcie: lh: Add PCIe EPF driver for Local Host Message-ID: References: <20210108212600.36850-1-mgross@linux.intel.com> <20210108212600.36850-10-mgross@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 11:48:29AM +0000, Thokala, Srikanth wrote: > > > +{ > > > + struct pci_epf_bar *epf_bar; > > > + bool bar_fixed_64bit; > > > + int ret, i; > > > + > > > + for (i = BAR_0; i <= BAR_5; i++) { > > > + epf_bar = &epf->bar[i]; > > > + bar_fixed_64bit = !!(epc_features->bar_fixed_64bit & (1 << > > i)); > > > + if (bar_fixed_64bit) > > > + epf_bar->flags |= PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64; > > > + if (epc_features->bar_fixed_size[i]) > > > + epf_bar->size = epc_features->bar_fixed_size[i]; > > > + > > > + if (i == BAR_2) { > > > + ret = intel_xpcie_check_bar(epf, epf_bar, BAR_2, > > > + BAR2_MIN_SIZE, > > > + epc_features->reserved_bar); > > > + if (ret) > > > + return ret; > > > + } > > > + > > > + if (i == BAR_4) { > > > + ret = intel_xpcie_check_bar(epf, epf_bar, BAR_4, > > > + BAR4_MIN_SIZE, > > > + epc_features->reserved_bar); > > > + if (ret) > > > + return ret; > > > + } > > > > Why do you need to check all of this? Where is the data coming from > > that could be incorrect? > > PCI BAR attributes, as inputs, are coming from the PCIe controller driver > through PCIe End Point Framework. These checks are required to compare the > configuration this driver is expecting to the configuration coming from > the PCIe controller driver. So why do you not trust that information coming from the caller? Shouldn't it always be correct as it already is validated by that in-kernel caller? Don't check for things you don't have to check for because you control the code that calls this stuff. thanks, greg k-h