Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp2426759pxb; Sun, 24 Jan 2021 06:36:57 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzSnAAt3M0Ts0bBwdpaqY+KjgwMhds3A3ovLc1YfSKTkn7rbF+8SYQQo/4AnZl3TkaMxbRJ X-Received: by 2002:a50:84e7:: with SMTP id 94mr440725edq.87.1611499017532; Sun, 24 Jan 2021 06:36:57 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1611499017; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=quB1TL+YWe+M+V3N+YvpEe3aGyhIUM5LxloeGKtuqAXDsHNe9zcR4ukmhg+Rs56AZm YMCMuhwMcU7DQss3oWqniV23HnMIn/3VHRkKkqTgDWjzdB8dbGxqt1wr+O7+AKGaxoxV mtzzBk1l46tFC/CIcNzKv668sj7wWq3mTrdz6F65K5n4SNZPTsPXBZRg2Y6XBHgnYKpU ymXQrrMs+maisnJWPa/DMozACWgtX1MT8ygthSPzEKteL+NzFFLx3DrG2rD0Lg0px9dx wkT5IQjHfXAVQSdUTuugoX1m/FZwx0rz3h3AsyLc6NkiYK8/GqdbbXFKXFjatDvSf6He dr1w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=54mGUUgjaAmlIn1ZbS0axlMay5ULjA3Saov7DnDgTls=; b=hV80pvrC46te2tHA3C1oWdVWj7S7dSh0TOcM4aSAPpdslB75VCw2QJ1FoHnec07v5d ZmlLNEQgaSpLWUmxFD4r1JSVV+n+FPwTtNGeanlH35D+Utxuees1hztXf2LAiUy/Sy+B slpMFimiebObB9nUNGeDr4y1z3/Ipf/LUvfICnAzFs9v7KDsOb3x0IiAlcJRrjfTcs1R KLHg+jQpH5BNscZkgnSTAStVax4VkQksxEIuXiIR3gFcF2/UjyO/0sR4bT//JUfsjUuH ARjIcCVm7yoWMp1OmlmSZX8lzd5i60GErHWqQHI4KWWBM1WxlXuNTXZVjR8weO1WVHw1 xTBA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q22si5095306ejy.339.2021.01.24.06.36.33; Sun, 24 Jan 2021 06:36:57 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726175AbhAXOfG (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 24 Jan 2021 09:35:06 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:56446 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725948AbhAXOew (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Jan 2021 09:34:52 -0500 Received: from archlinux (cpc108967-cmbg20-2-0-cust86.5-4.cable.virginm.net [81.101.6.87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C028622CF6; Sun, 24 Jan 2021 14:34:09 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2021 14:34:04 +0000 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Oleksij Rempel Cc: Rob Herring , William Breathitt Gray , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Pengutronix Kernel Team , David Jander , Robin van der Gracht , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: counter: add gpio-pulse-counter binding Message-ID: <20210124143404.4a029d62@archlinux> In-Reply-To: <20210122112434.27886-2-o.rempel@pengutronix.de> References: <20210122112434.27886-1-o.rempel@pengutronix.de> <20210122112434.27886-2-o.rempel@pengutronix.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 22 Jan 2021 12:24:33 +0100 Oleksij Rempel wrote: > Add binding for GPIO based pulse counter node > This does make me wonder a bit on whether we are going to soon need a provider / consumer interface for the counter subsystem. Afterall, this pulse is coming from something and I doubt it will be long before we want to describe that 'something' plus it may have additional controls etc. Anyhow, that's a question for another day. A few minor things inline. Jonathan > Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel > --- > .../bindings/counter/gpio-pulse-counter.yaml | 39 +++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/counter/gpio-pulse-counter.yaml > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/counter/gpio-pulse-counter.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/counter/gpio-pulse-counter.yaml > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..dfa93956f15c > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/counter/gpio-pulse-counter.yaml > @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > +%YAML 1.2 > +--- > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/counter/gpio-pulse-counter.yaml# > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > + > +title: GPIO base pulse counter Whilst it's moderately obvious I think a short description here would be useful. > + > +maintainers: > + - Oleksij Rempel > + > +properties: > + compatible: > + const: virtual,gpio-pulse-counter > + > + gpios: > + maxItems: 1 > + > +required: > + - gpios > + > +additionalProperties: false > + > +examples: > + - | > + > + #include > + > + counter-0 { > + compatible = "virtual,gpio-pulse-counter"; > + gpios = <&gpio 0 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; > + }; > + > + counter-1 { > + compatible = "virtual,gpio-pulse-counter"; > + gpios = <&gpio 1 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; > + }; The second example doesn't tell us anything new, so I'd drop it and just have counter-0 > + > +...