Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CABXGCsMvRzY_JHH4cPtxQ3nsYrsEJFgD0Wh5Aimx+iGB8GnY3g@mail.gmail.com>
 <20210124111047.13404-1-hdanton@sina.com>
In-Reply-To: <20210124111047.13404-1-hdanton@sina.com>
From:   Mikhail Gavrilov <mikhail.v.gavrilov@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 24 Jan 2021 23:23:31 +0500
Message-ID: <CABXGCsMY5eEefYLvnqtws8MRAqHOaDW9JwfsCPnLZydLDQqyuA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in __list_add_valid+0x81/0xa0 (5.11-rc4)
To:     Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, 24 Jan 2021 at 16:11, Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com> wrote:
>
> If it is supposed due to the race between pool->stale_lock and
> pool->lock that are both protecting the buddy list_head then adding
> another one can be a cure.  The diff below is not for any test.

Thanks for looking at the issue.
Why the proposed patch not intended for testing?
It is not the final (optimal) variant?


-- 
Best Regards,
Mike Gavrilov.