Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: Pending patches for linux-sh
From:   John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
To:     Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Cc:     Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>,
        Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
        Linux-sh list <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <133f8171-09ec-39b3-0660-de780cd879d6@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Message-ID: <f14d4205-2031-7727-e013-7f75d17d4656@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Date:   Sun, 24 Jan 2021 23:07:17 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <133f8171-09ec-39b3-0660-de780cd879d6@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

Hi Rich!

The following patches are still missing after the 5.11 SH pull:

> - [PATCH] [sh] fix trivial misannotations
> - https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=160945707001399&w=2
> 
> - [PATCH] sh: check return code of request_irq
> - https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=160867050030140&w=2
> 
> - [PATCH] sh: boards: Fix the cacography in irq.c
> - https://marc.info/?l=linux-sh&m=160578410511403&w=2
> 
> - [PATCH 1/2] sh: boot: add intermediate vmlinux.bin* to targets instead of extra-y
> - https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=161088234517301&w=2
> 
> - [PATCH 2/2] sh: boot: avoid unneeded rebuilds under arch/sh/boot/compressed/
> - https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=161088245817344&w=2
>
> - [PATCH] maple: fix wrong return value of maple_bus_init().
> - https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=160635878212678&w=2
> 
> - [PATCH] sh: kdump: add some attribute to function
> - https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=160758311622653&w=2
> 
> - [PATCH] sh: kernel: traps: remove unused variable
> - https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=160760435528709&w=2

Shall they go in for 5.12?

They all look fine to me as they're either trivial fixes or I verified that they
don't cause any regression on my SH-7785LCR system.

Adrian

-- 
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer - glaubitz@debian.org
`. `'   Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de
  `-    GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913