Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S281347AbRKEVNm>; Mon, 5 Nov 2001 16:13:42 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S281348AbRKEVNd>; Mon, 5 Nov 2001 16:13:33 -0500
Received: from mailout03.sul.t-online.com ([194.25.134.81]:25226 "EHLO
	mailout03.sul.t-online.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S281347AbRKEVNP>; Mon, 5 Nov 2001 16:13:15 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Thomas Koeller <tkoeller@gmx.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Scheduling of low-priority background processes
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 22:12:24 +0100
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0111051906560.27028-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0111051906560.27028-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <01110522122402.00641@sarkovy.koeller.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Sorry, that mail was incomplete, I did not mean to send it.

Thomas

On Monday,  5. November 2001 22:08, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Nov 2001, Thomas Koeller wrote:
> > So here is my question:
> >
> > Some operating systems I have been working with had a scheduling
> > policy different from what I find in Linux.
>
> I'm not sure what you want to ask, though I guess you're not
> too happy about the fact that niced processes still get a lot
> of CPU time in Linux ;)
>
> If this was what you wanted to say, this is something I've been
> planning to fix for a while and, now that my VM has been removed
>
> >from the kernel, I'll have some time for too...
>
> cheers,
>
> Rik

-- 
Thomas Koeller
tkoeller@gmx.net
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/