Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 5 Nov 2001 16:13:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 5 Nov 2001 16:13:33 -0500 Received: from mailout03.sul.t-online.com ([194.25.134.81]:25226 "EHLO mailout03.sul.t-online.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 5 Nov 2001 16:13:15 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Thomas Koeller To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Scheduling of low-priority background processes Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 22:12:24 +0100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01110522122402.00641@sarkovy.koeller.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sorry, that mail was incomplete, I did not mean to send it. Thomas On Monday, 5. November 2001 22:08, Rik van Riel wrote: > On Mon, 5 Nov 2001, Thomas Koeller wrote: > > So here is my question: > > > > Some operating systems I have been working with had a scheduling > > policy different from what I find in Linux. > > I'm not sure what you want to ask, though I guess you're not > too happy about the fact that niced processes still get a lot > of CPU time in Linux ;) > > If this was what you wanted to say, this is something I've been > planning to fix for a while and, now that my VM has been removed > > >from the kernel, I'll have some time for too... > > cheers, > > Rik -- Thomas Koeller tkoeller@gmx.net - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/