Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp3110522pxb; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 07:14:45 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJySgFz9woO1gWZl8B7FVxpbQeC3XCDlxVgBuoqC0JBx3CTH7z/fP5jlGaC34u85862kvZ+h X-Received: by 2002:a50:eacd:: with SMTP id u13mr851066edp.382.1611587685360; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 07:14:45 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1611587685; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=y/8xin+uFsEwlsSzVYe7bxQStMBWxA0WMZ1AJ0Jn9lNq3Rp3gYa89prWiDMIws7SMg PWzkI/9bNgXGZpyWj9EFLHKlDWJ80UPkTiCjRBHUn/TixlrfOb4hFm4g4v9DXnsgaAVP WoO3/iWYVtXJoLbIabrrP2l3oCB6+ob9xDuAGmCSFN+wHPgY05O4sohEvVqByyEAygq0 EX1caWi7j33t3DG/iki2EOo1hw/yUfHNWirzEOI/xS8wGyvefkIpnBQCbQrMguDh7nj0 YeqO/XgWsEX+gNVXCNKbvKXiokNOIlr16wScozicbDP19MlYcq14vxLJMvcGyZzyQ6V7 4+/g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject; bh=Uqsj/3ksJwsFQVawM08Fj4U7EEkJOfpMmShBDHKM38Y=; b=K/9dzbDm4O6jWfndBbKJyUduBSWnTtIFTlCg3hrWsaMGcT5F71hcddebfd3a+zEVzE xdQofO8A3Ar6i3UjZSYVnKogKCzW9gddUKa1MShDEnj68kxviKqSXeXLFqeL8hrnacg3 iWrGemdK4y1df472mIbgR9HCx3dCluLPzKLmkQB4VvwkrT1fTWiJISadvRhPPYX3ZKU6 BKVz81XLi3PQtO00xpq0K2cZJ54O2XIqd9I0Uzzneiw4TybA5/xhvBC9ZRecOyEWd8w9 aafHjVKkB+khVGbSie0XXKv47tvwmZPSAd7vA7uY/LJSLo0Jdpn01Q6eIpiCWA2pzkKq qL2w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c14si7308792edv.132.2021.01.25.07.14.20; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 07:14:45 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729816AbhAYPNK (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 25 Jan 2021 10:13:10 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49740 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729821AbhAYOwr (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jan 2021 09:52:47 -0500 Received: from relay01.th.seeweb.it (relay01.th.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b7a:2000:18::162]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E475C06174A; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 06:51:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from IcarusMOD.eternityproject.eu (unknown [2.237.20.237]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by m-r1.th.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A764B1F8AC; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 15:51:54 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] media: venus: core: Add sdm660 DT compatible and resource struct To: Hans Verkuil , Stanimir Varbanov Cc: agross@kernel.org, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, mchehab@kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, konrad.dybcio@somainline.org, marijn.suijten@somainline.org, phone-devel@vger.kernel.org References: <20210115185252.333562-1-angelogioacchino.delregno@somainline.org> <20210115185252.333562-2-angelogioacchino.delregno@somainline.org> <2dc8a95f-110f-526f-18a8-6393e508c3a6@linaro.org> From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno Message-ID: <40c38734-a69d-2314-c342-244ee5a0e6b1@somainline.org> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 15:51:54 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Il 25/01/21 11:40, Hans Verkuil ha scritto: > On 18/01/2021 18:45, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: >> Il 18/01/21 18:21, Stanimir Varbanov ha scritto: >>> Hi Angelo, >>> >>> Thanks for the patch! >>> >>> On 1/15/21 8:52 PM, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: >>>> Add the SDM660 DT compatible and its resource structure, also >>>> including support for the Venus pmdomains, in order to support >>>> the Venus block in SDM630, SDM636, SDM660 and SDA variants. >>>> >>>> This SoC features Venus 4.4 (HFI3XX), with one vcodec used for >>>> both encoding and decoding, switched on through two GDSCs. >>>> The core clock for this Venus chip is powered by the RPM VDD_CX >>>> power domain. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno >>>> --- >>>> drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/core.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>> 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/core.c b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/core.c >>>> index bdd293faaad0..83ca86a63241 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/core.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/core.c >>>> @@ -565,6 +565,71 @@ static const struct venus_resources sdm845_res_v2 = { >>>> .fwname = "qcom/venus-5.2/venus.mdt", >>>> }; >>>> >>>> +static const struct freq_tbl sdm660_freq_table[] = { >>>> + { 0, 518400000 }, >>>> + { 0, 441600000 }, >>>> + { 0, 404000000 }, >>>> + { 0, 320000000 }, >>>> + { 0, 269330000 }, >>>> + { 0, 133330000 }, >>>> +}; >>>> + >>>> +static const struct reg_val sdm660_reg_preset[] = { >>>> + { 0x80010, 0x001f001f }, >>>> + { 0x80018, 0x00000156 }, >>>> + { 0x8001C, 0x00000156 }, >>>> +}; >>>> + >>>> +static const struct bw_tbl sdm660_bw_table_enc[] = { >>>> + { 979200, 1044000, 0, 2446336, 0 }, /* 4k UHD @ 30 */ >>>> + { 864000, 887000, 0, 2108416, 0 }, /* 720p @ 240 */ >>>> + { 489600, 666000, 0, 1207296, 0 }, /* 1080p @ 60 */ >>>> + { 432000, 578000, 0, 1058816, 0 }, /* 720p @ 120 */ >>>> + { 244800, 346000, 0, 616448, 0 }, /* 1080p @ 30 */ >>>> + { 216000, 293000, 0, 534528, 0 }, /* 720p @ 60 */ >>>> + { 108000, 151000, 0, 271360, 0 }, /* 720p @ 30 */ >>>> +}; >>>> + >>>> +static const struct bw_tbl sdm660_bw_table_dec[] = { >>>> + { 979200, 2365000, 0, 1892000, 0 }, /* 4k UHD @ 30 */ >>>> + { 864000, 1978000, 0, 1554000, 0 }, /* 720p @ 240 */ >>>> + { 489600, 1133000, 0, 895000, 0 }, /* 1080p @ 60 */ >>>> + { 432000, 994000, 0, 781000, 0 }, /* 720p @ 120 */ >>>> + { 244800, 580000, 0, 460000, 0 }, /* 1080p @ 30 */ >>>> + { 216000, 501000, 0, 301000, 0 }, /* 720p @ 60 */ >>>> + { 108000, 255000, 0, 202000, 0 }, /* 720p @ 30 */ >>>> +}; >>>> + >>>> +static const struct venus_resources sdm660_res = { >>>> + .freq_tbl = sdm660_freq_table, >>>> + .freq_tbl_size = ARRAY_SIZE(sdm660_freq_table), >>>> + .reg_tbl = sdm660_reg_preset, >>>> + .reg_tbl_size = ARRAY_SIZE(sdm660_reg_preset), >>>> + .bw_tbl_enc = sdm660_bw_table_enc, >>>> + .bw_tbl_enc_size = ARRAY_SIZE(sdm660_bw_table_enc), >>>> + .bw_tbl_dec = sdm660_bw_table_dec, >>>> + .bw_tbl_dec_size = ARRAY_SIZE(sdm660_bw_table_dec), >>>> + .clks = {"core", "iface", "bus_throttle", "bus" }, >>>> + .clks_num = 4, >>>> + .vcodec0_clks = { "vcodec0_core" }, >>>> + .vcodec_clks_num = 1, >>>> + .vcodec_pmdomains = { "venus", "vcodec0" }, >>>> + .vcodec_pmdomains_num = 2, >>>> + .opp_pmdomain = (const char *[]) { "cx", NULL }, >>>> + .vcodec_num = 1, >>>> + .max_load = 1036800, >>>> + .hfi_version = HFI_VERSION_3XX, >>>> + .vmem_id = VIDC_RESOURCE_NONE, >>>> + .vmem_size = 0, >>>> + .vmem_addr = 0, >>>> + .cp_start = 0, >>>> + .cp_size = 0x79000000, >>>> + .cp_nonpixel_start = 0x1000000, >>>> + .cp_nonpixel_size = 0x28000000, >>>> + .dma_mask = 0xd9000000 - 1, >>>> + .fwname = "qcom/venus-4.4/venus.mdt", >>> >>> Did you try venus-4.2 firmware from linux-firmware tree [1] ? >>> >> >> No I haven't.. and I can't... my Sony devices (but I think that this is >> a practice of all OEMs/ODMs) are using a Sony signed venus firmware, so >> I am totally limited to use the firmware that comes with the device. >> >> Besides that, the version is still different so, even if I had any >> possibility to try that, I don't think that it would work anyway... Hello! > > I'm a bit confused. "qcom/venus-4.4/venus.mdt" is the Sony signed FW? > In my case it is, but this follows the generic firmware path as was done for all the other Venus firmwares, so my code is not pointing at Sony specific things, but just generic ones. Every Qualcomm-powered consumer device (smartphones, tablets etc) have got a double sigcheck: one for qcom, one for OEM specific and most of the times the TZ is configured to accept only firmwares that also have the OEM signature. This is not true for all the firmwares - for example, Adreno has this mechanism only for the ZAP part - but unfortunately I'm not aware of any consumer device accepting a Venus firmware with the "generic" Qualcomm signature only (so - without the OEM signature). Short answer: 1. qcom/venus-4.4/venus.mdt is a generic firmware for Venus 2. 99% of the people needs a different firmware for signature issues > This patch can't be merged unless there is a corresponding firmware available > in linux-firmware. Is the current 4.2 firmware in linux-firmware signed by > Qualcomm? Can they provided 4.4 firmware as well? > If there is such issue, then maybe we should do "something" about it: I would then propose to remove all references to fwname and just get this done in DT, where every qcom board already specifies its own path for its own firmware. In any case, the issue that you're raising here has been raised multiple times on LKML, I don't precisely remember, but I recall seeing this for something like 4 years (or even more) being raised every now and then... > I have no idea how this works for the venus driver, but I hope Stanimir does. > As far as I've understood, this driver just uses the firmware which path is hardcoded in fwname, even though at this point I would like to get an opinion from Stanimir. Would you be ok if we start parsing firmware-name from DT for this driver? The flow would be something like: Is firmware-name DT property present? Yes -> Use FW path from firmware-name property No -> Use the FW path from the fwname field of struct venus_resources This is a common flow in at least freedreno and remoteproc (modem). -- Angelo > Regards, > > Hans > >> >>>> +}; >>>> + >>>> static const struct freq_tbl sc7180_freq_table[] = { >>>> { 0, 500000000 }, >>>> { 0, 434000000 }, >>>> @@ -613,6 +678,7 @@ static const struct venus_resources sc7180_res = { >>>> static const struct of_device_id venus_dt_match[] = { >>>> { .compatible = "qcom,msm8916-venus", .data = &msm8916_res, }, >>>> { .compatible = "qcom,msm8996-venus", .data = &msm8996_res, }, >>>> + { .compatible = "qcom,sdm660-venus", .data = &sdm660_res, }, >>>> { .compatible = "qcom,sdm845-venus", .data = &sdm845_res, }, >>>> { .compatible = "qcom,sdm845-venus-v2", .data = &sdm845_res_v2, }, >>>> { .compatible = "qcom,sc7180-venus", .data = &sc7180_res, }, >>>> >>> >>> Reviewed-by: Stanimir Varbanov >>> >> >> Thank you! >> - Angelo >> >