Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Introduce PRU remoteproc consumer API
To:     "santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com" <santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
CC:     Grzegorz Jaszczyk <grzegorz.jaszczyk@linaro.org>,
        <ohad@wizery.com>, <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        <robh+dt@kernel.org>, <ssantosh@kernel.org>,
        <linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>, <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
        <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <praneeth@ti.com>,
        <rogerq@kernel.org>
References: <20201216165239.2744-1-grzegorz.jaszczyk@linaro.org>
 <20210106232704.GE9149@xps15> <11303a1b-5ab4-def5-77b1-c500894c9c87@ti.com>
 <20210107224448.GB43045@xps15> <75365443-57e3-e2e0-5865-f78af9d5890b@ti.com>
 <b0e32ad0-487f-9d57-7287-835eee836514@oracle.com>
From:   Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Message-ID: <c5252e8d-094a-dcb7-7ccb-172e58ab3413@ti.com>
Date:   Mon, 25 Jan 2021 09:43:18 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <b0e32ad0-487f-9d57-7287-835eee836514@oracle.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

Hi Santosh,

On 1/24/21 10:34 PM, santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com wrote:
> Hi Suman, Mathieu,
> 
> On 1/7/21 2:49 PM, Suman Anna wrote:
>> On 1/7/21 4:44 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 06:03:25PM -0600, Suman Anna wrote:
>>>> Hi Mathieu,
>>>>
> [...]
>>> I only see input from Andy and Lars in the thread you point out, nothing from
>>> Greg.  I have also taken a look at the patch [1] that made checkpatch complain
>>> about ENOTSUPP.  From what I see in that commit log the goal is to prevent new
>>> additions of ENOTSUPP to the kernel.
>>>
>>> Please modify and resend, otherwise I'm sure someone will send another patch to
>>> fix it before the end of the cycle.
>>
>> Yeah ok. I will send out a v3.
>>
> I haven't seen v3 of this series yet. Please post it
> if you would like to include it for 5.12.

This series is dependent on couple of patches that would have to come through
the remoteproc tree first, and I need to post the next versions of those as
well. So, let me sort out those first. You can drop this from your queue for 5.12.

regards
Suman