Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964896AbWIQBP4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Sep 2006 21:15:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964898AbWIQBP4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Sep 2006 21:15:56 -0400 Received: from scrub.xs4all.nl ([194.109.195.176]:13492 "EHLO scrub.xs4all.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964896AbWIQBP4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Sep 2006 21:15:56 -0400 Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 03:15:17 +0200 (CEST) From: Roman Zippel X-X-Sender: roman@scrub.home To: Ingo Molnar cc: Thomas Gleixner , karim@opersys.com, Andrew Morton , Paul Mundt , Jes Sorensen , Mathieu Desnoyers , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Ingo Molnar , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Tom Zanussi , ltt-dev@shafik.org, Michel Dagenais Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108 In-Reply-To: <20060916230031.GB20180@elte.hu> Message-ID: References: <1158351780.5724.507.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20060915204812.GA6909@elte.hu> <20060915215112.GB12789@elte.hu> <20060915231419.GA24731@elte.hu> <20060916082214.GD6317@elte.hu> <20060916230031.GB20180@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 725 Lines: 22 Hi, On Sun, 17 Sep 2006, Ingo Molnar wrote: > Lets see the equation of the current situation. On one side you want > static tracing but you dont want to implement kprobes on m68k - although > you probably could. You would have a point if would it be just about m68k. > On the other side there is the main kernel, which, > if it ever accepted static tracepoints, could probably never get rid of > them. If they are useful and not hurting anyone, why should we? bye, Roman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/