Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20210113160557.1801480-1-elver@google.com> <CABVgOSnHh8-s+AYifkDjCDKCkkFcm=WiGSuuf2JFiMvjAU1Kew@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABVgOSnHh8-s+AYifkDjCDKCkkFcm=WiGSuuf2JFiMvjAU1Kew@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Date:   Tue, 26 Jan 2021 12:02:28 +0100
Message-ID: <CANpmjNPeKY7HZe0+zYx6BQ+oJ97Hq5j2V9QcHS_gjOJTtr8ENw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kcsan: Make test follow KUnit style recommendations
To:     David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Cc:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
        kasan-dev <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 26 Jan 2021 at 05:35, David Gow <davidgow@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 12:06 AM Marco Elver <elver@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > Per recently added KUnit style recommendations at
> > Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/style.rst, make the following changes to
> > the KCSAN test:
> >
> >         1. Rename 'kcsan-test.c' to 'kcsan_test.c'.
> >
> >         2. Rename suite name 'kcsan-test' to 'kcsan'.
> >
> >         3. Rename CONFIG_KCSAN_TEST to CONFIG_KCSAN_KUNIT_TEST and
> >            default to KUNIT_ALL_TESTS.
> >
> > Cc: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
>
> Thanks very much -- it's great to see the naming guidelines starting
> to be picked up. I also tested the KUNIT_ALL_TESTS config option w/
> KCSAN enabled, and it worked a treat.
>
> My only note is that we've had some problems[1] with mm-related
> changes which rename files getting corrupted at some point before
> reaching Linus, so it's probably worth keeping a close eye on this
> change to make sure nothing goes wrong.

KCSAN changes go through Paul's -rcu tree, and once there's a stable
commit (latest when it reaches -tip) I would expect Git won't mess
things up.

> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>

Thanks for taking a look!

-- Marco

> -- David
>
> [1]: https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mm/msg239149.html