Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: md_raid: mdX_raid6 looping after sync_action "check" to "idle"
 transition
To:     Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@cloud.ionos.com>,
        Song Liu <song@kernel.org>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        it+raid@molgen.mpg.de
References: <aa9567fd-38e1-7b9c-b3e1-dc2fdc055da5@molgen.mpg.de>
 <95fbd558-5e46-7a6a-43ac-bcc5ae8581db@cloud.ionos.com>
 <77244d60-1c2d-330e-71e6-4907d4dd65fc@molgen.mpg.de>
 <7c5438c7-2324-cc50-db4d-512587cb0ec9@molgen.mpg.de>
 <b289ae15-ff82-b36e-4be4-a1c8bbdbacd7@cloud.ionos.com>
 <37c158cb-f527-34f5-2482-cae138bc8b07@molgen.mpg.de>
 <efb8d47b-ab9b-bdb9-ee2f-fb1be66343b1@molgen.mpg.de>
 <55e30408-ac63-965f-769f-18be5fd5885c@molgen.mpg.de>
 <d95aa962-9750-c27c-639a-2362bdb32f41@cloud.ionos.com>
 <30576384-682c-c021-ff16-bebed8251365@molgen.mpg.de>
 <cdc0b03c-db53-35bc-2f75-93bbca0363b5@molgen.mpg.de>
 <bc342de0-98d2-1733-39cd-cc1999777ff3@molgen.mpg.de>
 <c3390ab0-d038-f1c3-5544-67ae9c8408b1@cloud.ionos.com>
 <a27c5a64-62bf-592c-e547-1e8e904e3c97@molgen.mpg.de>
 <6c7008df-942e-13b1-2e70-a058e96ab0e9@cloud.ionos.com>
From:   Donald Buczek <buczek@molgen.mpg.de>
Message-ID: <12f09162-c92f-8fbb-8382-cba6188bfb29@molgen.mpg.de>
Date:   Tue, 26 Jan 2021 13:58:06 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6c7008df-942e-13b1-2e70-a058e96ab0e9@cloud.ionos.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk


On 26.01.21 12:14, Guoqing Jiang wrote:
> Hi Donald,
> 
> On 1/26/21 10:50, Donald Buczek wrote:
> [...]
> 
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
>>>> index 2d21c298ffa7..f40429843906 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/md/md.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/md/md.c
>>>> @@ -4687,11 +4687,13 @@ action_store(struct mddev *mddev, const char *page, size_t len)
>>>>               clear_bit(MD_RECOVERY_FROZEN, &mddev->recovery);
>>>>           if (test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING, &mddev->recovery) &&
>>>>               mddev_lock(mddev) == 0) {
>>>> +            set_bit(MD_ALLOW_SB_UPDATE, &mddev->flags);
>>>>               flush_workqueue(md_misc_wq);
>>>>               if (mddev->sync_thread) {
>>>>                   set_bit(MD_RECOVERY_INTR, &mddev->recovery);
>>>>                   md_reap_sync_thread(mddev);
>>>>               }
>>>> +            clear_bit(MD_ALLOW_SB_UPDATE, &mddev->flags);
>>>>               mddev_unlock(mddev);
>>>>           }
>>>>       } else if (test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING, &mddev->recovery))
>>>
>>> Yes, it could break the deadlock issue, but I am not sure if it is the right way given we only set ALLOW_SB_UPDATE in suspend which makes sense since the io will be quiesced, but write idle action can't guarantee the  similar thing.
>>
>> Thinking (and documenting) MD_ALLOW_SB_UPDATE as "the holder of reconfig_mutex promises not to make any changes which would exclude superblocks from being written" might make it easier to accept the usage.
> 
> I am not sure it is safe to set the flag here since write idle can't prevent IO from fs while mddev_suspend can guarantee that.
> 
>>
>>> I prefer to make resync thread not wait forever here.
>>>
> 
> [...]
> 
>>>
>>> -        sh = raid5_get_active_stripe(conf, new_sector, previous,
>>> +        sh = raid5_get_active_stripe(conf, new_sector, previous, 0,
>>
>>
>> Mistake here (fourth argument added instead of third)
> 
> Thanks for checking.
> 
> [...]
> 
>> Unfortunately, this patch did not fix the issue.
>>
>>      root@sloth:~/linux# cat /proc/$(pgrep md3_resync)/stack
>>      [<0>] raid5_get_active_stripe+0x1e7/0x6b0
>>      [<0>] raid5_sync_request+0x2a7/0x3d0
>>      [<0>] md_do_sync.cold+0x3ee/0x97c
>>      [<0>] md_thread+0xab/0x160
>>      [<0>] kthread+0x11b/0x140
>>      [<0>] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
>>
>> which is ( according to objdump -d -Sl drivers/md/raid5.o ) at https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.11-rc5/source/drivers/md/raid5.c#L735
>>
>> Isn't it still the case that the superblocks are not written, therefore stripes are not processed, therefore number of active stripes are not decreasing? Who is expected to wake up conf->wait_for_stripe waiters?
> 
> Hmm, how about wake the waiter up in the while loop of raid5d?
> 
> @@ -6520,6 +6532,11 @@ static void raid5d(struct md_thread *thread)
>                          md_check_recovery(mddev);
>                          spin_lock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
>                  }
> +
> +               if ((atomic_read(&conf->active_stripes)
> +                    < (conf->max_nr_stripes * 3 / 4) ||
> +                    (test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_INTR, &mddev->recovery))))
> +                       wake_up(&conf->wait_for_stripe);
>          }
>          pr_debug("%d stripes handled\n", handled);

Hmm... With this patch on top of your other one, we still have the basic symptoms (md3_raid6 busy looping), but the sync thread is now hanging at

     root@sloth:~# cat /proc/$(pgrep md3_resync)/stack
     [<0>] md_do_sync.cold+0x8ec/0x97c
     [<0>] md_thread+0xab/0x160
     [<0>] kthread+0x11b/0x140
     [<0>] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30

instead, which is https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/md/md.c#L8963

And, unlike before, "md: md3: data-check interrupted." from the pr_info two lines above appears in dmesg.

Best
   Donald

> If the issue still appears then I will change the waiter to break just if MD_RECOVERY_INTR is set, something like.
> 
> wait_event_lock_irq(conf->wait_for_stripe,
>      (test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_INTR, &mddev->recovery) && sync_req) ||
>       /* the previous condition */,
>      *(conf->hash_locks + hash));
> 
> Thanks,
> Guoqing