Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932244AbWIQPDI (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Sep 2006 11:03:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932246AbWIQPDI (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Sep 2006 11:03:08 -0400 Received: from scrub.xs4all.nl ([194.109.195.176]:3002 "EHLO scrub.xs4all.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932244AbWIQPDG (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Sep 2006 11:03:06 -0400 Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 17:02:13 +0200 (CEST) From: Roman Zippel X-X-Sender: roman@scrub.home To: Ingo Molnar cc: Paul Mundt , Karim Yaghmour , linux-kernel , Ingo Molnar , Jes Sorensen , Andrew Morton , Tom Zanussi , Richard J Moore , "Frank Ch. Eigler" , Michel Dagenais , Mathieu Desnoyers , Christoph Hellwig , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Thomas Gleixner , William Cohen , "Martin J. Bligh" Subject: Re: tracepoint maintainance models In-Reply-To: <20060917143623.GB15534@elte.hu> Message-ID: References: <450D182B.9060300@opersys.com> <20060917112128.GA3170@localhost.usen.ad.jp> <20060917143623.GB15534@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 673 Lines: 19 Hi, On Sun, 17 Sep 2006, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > This thread would be much better off talking about how to go about > > implementing lightweight markers rather than spent on mindless rants. > > i agree, as long as it's lightweight markers for _dynamic tracers_, so > that we keep our options open - as per the arguments above. Could you please explain, why we can't have markers which are usable by any tracer? bye, Roman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/