Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964980AbWIQQDP (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Sep 2006 12:03:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964981AbWIQQDP (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Sep 2006 12:03:15 -0400 Received: from scrub.xs4all.nl ([194.109.195.176]:38074 "EHLO scrub.xs4all.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964980AbWIQQDO (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Sep 2006 12:03:14 -0400 Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 18:02:37 +0200 (CEST) From: Roman Zippel X-X-Sender: roman@scrub.home To: Ingo Molnar cc: Thomas Gleixner , karim@opersys.com, Andrew Morton , Paul Mundt , Jes Sorensen , Mathieu Desnoyers , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Ingo Molnar , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Tom Zanussi , ltt-dev@shafik.org, Michel Dagenais Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108 In-Reply-To: <20060917152527.GC20225@elte.hu> Message-ID: References: <20060915215112.GB12789@elte.hu> <20060915231419.GA24731@elte.hu> <20060916082214.GD6317@elte.hu> <20060916230031.GB20180@elte.hu> <20060917084207.GA8738@elte.hu> <20060917152527.GC20225@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1464 Lines: 31 Hi, On Sun, 17 Sep 2006, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > The foremost issue is still that there is only limited kprobes > > support. > > > The main issue in supporting static tracers are the tracepoints and so > > far I haven't seen any convincing proof that the maintainance overhead > > of dynamic and static tracepoints has to be significantly different. > > to both points i (and others) already replied in great detail - please > follow up on them. (I can quote message-IDs if you cannot find them.) What you basically tell me is (rephrased to make it more clear): Implement kprobes support or fuck off! You make it very clear, that you're unwilling to support static tracers even to point to make _any_ static trace support impossible. It's impossible to discuss this with you, because you're absolutely unwilling to make any concessions. What am I supposed to do than it's very clear to me, that you don't want to make any compromise anyway? You leave me _nothing_ to work with, that's the main reason I leave such things unanswered. AFAICT there is nothing I can do about that than just repeating what I told you already anyway and you'll continue to ignore it and I'm sick and tired of it. bye, Roman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/