Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
In-Reply-To: <161161117911.29150.13853544418926100149@build.alporthouse.com>
References: <CAHk-=wgmJ0q1URHrOb-2iCOdZ8gYybiH6LY2Gq7cosXu6kxAnA@mail.gmail.com> <161160687463.28991.354987542182281928@build.alporthouse.com> <CAHk-=wh23BXwBwBgPmt9h2EJztnzKKf=qr5r=B0Hr6BGgZ-QDA@mail.gmail.com> <20210125213348.GB196782@linux.ibm.com> <161161117911.29150.13853544418926100149@build.alporthouse.com>
Subject: Re: Linux 5.11-rc5
From:   Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Tue, 26 Jan 2021 09:33:39 +0000
Message-ID: <161165361960.29150.15515544628767131483@build.alporthouse.com>
User-Agent: alot/0.9
Precedence: bulk

Quoting Chris Wilson (2021-01-25 21:46:19)
> Quoting Mike Rapoport (2021-01-25 21:33:48)
> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 12:49:39PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > Mike: should we perhaps revert the first patch too (commit
> > > bde9cfa3afe4: "x86/setup: don't remove E820_TYPE_RAM for pfn 0")?
> > 
> > I wonder, maybe actually this one is causing troubles?
> > 
> > Chris, would it be possible to check what happens if you revert only
> > bde9cfa3afe4?
> 
> Queued for CI, will be run in about an hour.

I ran just the revert of bde9cfa3afe4 through CI twice, on both occasions
all machines failed to boot. 
-Chris