Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965125AbWIQVxg (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Sep 2006 17:53:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965130AbWIQVxg (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Sep 2006 17:53:36 -0400 Received: from scrub.xs4all.nl ([194.109.195.176]:39869 "EHLO scrub.xs4all.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965125AbWIQVxg (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Sep 2006 17:53:36 -0400 Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 23:52:35 +0200 (CEST) From: Roman Zippel X-X-Sender: roman@scrub.home To: Ingo Molnar cc: Nick Piggin , Thomas Gleixner , karim@opersys.com, Andrew Morton , Paul Mundt , Jes Sorensen , Mathieu Desnoyers , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Ingo Molnar , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Tom Zanussi , ltt-dev@shafik.org, Michel Dagenais Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108 In-Reply-To: <20060917212345.GB2145@elte.hu> Message-ID: References: <20060916230031.GB20180@elte.hu> <20060917084207.GA8738@elte.hu> <20060917152527.GC20225@elte.hu> <450D7EF0.3020805@yahoo.com.au> <450D8C58.5000506@yahoo.com.au> <20060917212345.GB2145@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1179 Lines: 30 Hi, On Sun, 17 Sep 2006, Ingo Molnar wrote: > btw., you still have not retracted or corrected your false suggestion > that "concessions" or a "compromise" were possible and you did not > retract or correct your false accusation that i "dont want to make > them": Sorry, I have nothing to retract and I'm not interesting in playing your word games. :-( > > It's impossible to discuss this with you, because you're absolutely > > unwilling to make any concessions. What am I supposed to do than it's > > very clear to me, that you don't want to make any compromise anyway? > > while, as i explained it before, such a concession simply does not exist > - so i am not in the position to "make such a concession". There are > only two choices in essence: either we accept a generic static tracer, > or we reject it. Wrong, this is about the minimum support, which can be used by both static and dynamic tracers. bye, Roman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/