Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965140AbWIQWfT (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Sep 2006 18:35:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965141AbWIQWfT (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Sep 2006 18:35:19 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:43428 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965140AbWIQWfS (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Sep 2006 18:35:18 -0400 Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 00:27:10 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Roman Zippel Cc: Nick Piggin , Thomas Gleixner , karim@opersys.com, Andrew Morton , Paul Mundt , Jes Sorensen , Mathieu Desnoyers , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Ingo Molnar , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Tom Zanussi , ltt-dev@shafik.org, Michel Dagenais Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108 Message-ID: <20060917222710.GB8791@elte.hu> References: <20060917084207.GA8738@elte.hu> <20060917152527.GC20225@elte.hu> <450D7EF0.3020805@yahoo.com.au> <450D8C58.5000506@yahoo.com.au> <20060917212345.GB2145@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.9 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.9 required=5.9 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_50 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.0.3 -3.3 ALL_TRUSTED Did not pass through any untrusted hosts 0.5 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] -0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1132 Lines: 27 * Roman Zippel wrote: > On Sun, 17 Sep 2006, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > btw., you still have not retracted or corrected your false suggestion > > that "concessions" or a "compromise" were possible and you did not > > retract or correct your false accusation that i "dont want to make > > them": > > Sorry, I have nothing to retract and I'm not interesting in playing > your word games. :-( you are wrong if you call my asking you to retract your false suggestion and false accusation a "word game". It is my basic right to point out misrepresentations, false statements, false accusations and misinterpretations when i see them. The sentences i pointed out were not just opinions, they were materially false statements of yours. But you are of course free to not retract or correct them (or to not dispute my characterization of them as such). Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/